Don't do it then.
Leave the rest of us to live on the edge in peace.
Plus1. Best bit of bling on my bike by far.
Don't do it then.
Leave the rest of us to live on the edge in peace.
I was quoted £399 from Les for 4 sets, Low, Hi, 2x Aux lights all rated at HID50 including postage. Seems expensive when you look at ebay? Came across this site...
http://www.hids4u.co.uk/product.php?productid=147
and one kit HID55 only costs £83 compared to Less Wassall which is £159 for HID50. Any reason why so many seem to be loyal to Les and pay more? Is it because Les supplies plug n play kits and require very little to no modifications?
BMW were part of the NAZI machine, so they are fecking cunts by nature. Believe them and you end up in a fecking concentration camp.
For feck sake mate I thought I was a worrier.
Get over it .. you don't even fecking ride in the dark so why bother.
I suspect you won't even put more than 5k miles on your bike before you sell it. It doesn't matter if it has HID or not when it's sat in your garage mate. You are not going to fall off your fecking sofa!!
If the light is crap .. RIDE SLOWER. Feck me sherlock how the feck did I figure that one out. oh yeah ... I actually ride in the fecking dark
BMW says lots of shit. It's unstoppable ... yes their servo brakes are crap and you can't stop the fecking thing. So what did they do about it ... absolutely nothing. So why worry what a bunch of german pricks says. Get a good lawyer and sue the mother feckers if it goes wrong! BMW says there are no depreciation on their bikes .. try proving that when you got a year old bike to sell
BMW were part of the NAZI machine, so they are fecking cunts by nature. Believe them and you end up in a fecking concentration camp. I still can't get a BMW dealer to send me a replacement fecking receipt for a piece of shit tankbag they made. So why believe them on anything.
It's a fecking credit to you that your bike is still newer than when it left the showroom
Don't do it then.
Leave the rest of us to live on the edge in peace.
I can always count on Wapping for an informed reply! Regular as clockwork.
I did make an informed reply.
I read and was informed by your posts relating to:
(a) BuMW not recommending the conversion. Indeed to, "Stay away from them".
(b) The suitability of HID conversion, along with embedded links flagged up in a belief that what was in the links should be sufficient to turn our heads.
(c) The price and a suggestion that Les' were too expensive.
(d) A concern that your bike would fail its MOT and / or that the police would pull you over.
So, four very real (but unfounded) concerns posted and the implied belief that 100's on this site (and others) are doing something very wrong.
The honest reply is therefore that you should not buy or fit them, thereby relieving yourself - and the rest of us - of all your worries at a stroke.
Go in peace.
hmmm isn't a concentration camp a British invention old boy?
"The Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed. defines concentration camp as: a camp where non-combatants of a district are accommodated, such as those instituted by Lord Kitchener during the South African war of 1899-1902; one for the internment of political prisoners, foreign nationals, etc.
At the time that Kitchener started the concentration camps in South Africa the war had entered the guerilla phase. By destroying crops, livestock and farmsteads under the 'Scorched Earth' policy the Boer fighters were deprived of supplies and shelter. It also left the women and children on such farms destitute and they were forcibly removed, against their will, to the camps where thousands died of disease and starvation."
OK own up... Who has cloned Indecisives logon details.
...but we're not buying HID headlamp units, we're buying replacement lamps. Very different.Therefore a HID headlamp unit sold in the after market should:
No - as I understand the regs, this only applies to OEM stuff, not aftermarket.1. be type approved to ECE Regulation 98 as a component.
2. when fitted to the vehicle should enable ECE Regulation 48 to be complied with (although no government inspection will take place).
3. Comply with RVLR as far as "use" is concerned.
In practice this means:
1. The headlamp unit (outer lens, reflector, bulb) shall be type approved to ECE 98 and be "e-marked" to demonstrate this. That can only be done by the headlamp supplier - Hella, Valeo etc. who must test the headlamp in an independent laboratory.
2. Once fitted to the vehicle it must have headlamp cleaning and self-levelling (which can be for the headlamp or can be in the vehicle suspension - some expensive estate cars have "self-levelling suspension" and that is adequate). Also the dipped beam must stay on with the main beam.
3. The headlamp must be maintained in good working order, kept clean, and aligned/adjusted correctly like any other headlamp.
Not in this country, as far as I understand the regs. You can fit owt you want to any vehicle. Look at the number of jacked-up 4x4s, for example. As long as it passes the requirements for an MOT, anything goes.Under the Road Traffic Act 1988 it is an offence to supply, fit or use vehicle parts which are not legal.
Where in any regs does it say this, then? All the legislation that I have seen relates to new vehicles, i.e. OEM stuff. You can (largely) do what you want with an existing vehicle.In summary it is not permitted to convert an existing halogen headlamp unit for use with HID bulbs. The entire headlamp unit must be replaced with one designed and approved for use with HID bulbs and it must be installed in accordance with the rules stated above.
Unfortunately most TrafPol would need to consult the relevant regs (which are very vague) before being able to pursue a successful prosecution.the fact is the h i d kits r type approved and so lamp .igot pull to night for a ...why r you driving wid spot on..reply ....i ride my bike cops reply you think your smart ....my reply i am
turn them off .......reply by me there r driving lights ....cops reply you dont drive your bike ...off
The warning is very interesting and was worth posting IMHO. The letter seems to take a reasonable approach - check of your lighting set-up is likely to comply!
My R1200GS has aftermarket HIDs fitted and passed it's MoT without problem. It's quite correct that the MoT test is about alignment, but there is a brightness standard; not less than 200 candelans and not more than 800 candelans, but the traffic division of our local police told me they don't know of any force that has equipment for measuring candelan output. They opined that 'you'll know if your lights are dazzling people because lots of them will flash you'; sounds a pretty sensible response to me! Like the video clip suggests, I've noticed HIDs give greater light 'scatter', but so far only about one in a hundred drivers flashes me, about the same as when I had the standard bulbs; presumably they were letting me know I had forgotten to switch my headlights off in broad daylight!
There you go ph4824, your concerns are answered. Or do your own thing and leave well alone.
So why worry what a bunch of german pricks says. Get a good lawyer and sue the mother feckers if it goes wrong! BMW says there are no depreciation on their bikes .. try proving that when you got a year old bike to sell
BMW were part of the NAZI machine, so they are fecking cunts by nature. Believe them and you end up in a fecking concentration camp.
And this from someone who sent half of the Scotland Section (me included) a mystifying PM saying he was leaving UKGSer because it was full of racist crap
Not very p.c from some one who bangs on about racism IMO