anyone ever own an XS750 ?

turnipbmw

Registered user
Joined
Apr 28, 2006
Messages
4,120
Reaction score
0
Location
Aldbury
Quite a bit about them in the latest Classic bike mag.

I used to work on them and didn't really think much about them as a 20 ish year old.

But now, I could see they would have been a great bike - excellent riding position, fast enough, comfy, shaft drive, easy to work on etc
 

Attachments

  • radarpre1.jpg
    radarpre1.jpg
    45.6 KB · Views: 144
Yes, many moons ago. I really enjoyed mine and thought they looked far nicer than the slobby 850. Would be very nice to own another one. They had their problems, what vehicle doesn't - but still underrated I felt.

Back in those days the manufacturers often raided the parts bin and in the case of the XS750 , it shared RD250/400 clocks, ignition switch and idiot light pod.

XS750shaft.jpg
 
They do 115MPH (speedo) flat out, two up.....30ish years ago....B1249 into Foxholes North Yorkshire....Fat Kev' on the back, throttle WIDE open......:eek:

Happy days......:D
 
I thought they all had transmission issues?

Rare to see one these days.
 
had both 750 and 850,kept the 850 for 7 yrs, really god bike. :thumb

<a target='_blank' title='ImageShack - Image And Video Hosting' href='http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/267/xs85080814.jpg/'><img src='http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/7937/xs85080814.jpg' border='0'/></a><br>
 
I had a couple of pals who bought these when they were first introduced. They were really hyped up by the press and it was awardede'bike of the year' before it had really been made available to the public. It turned out to be a bit of a nightmare with probelems from it's hyvo primary chain which wore out, taking chunks out of the crankcase. Then swarf got in the oil causing untold damage. The pistone rings also gave trouble and the middle cylinder would seize if the oil level dropped even a tiny bit. The early bikes also wore out their points at an alarming rate and needed constantly adjusting. This was cured on later models by fitting electronic ignition. The engine mounts in some cases were known to settle . As it was mounted so close to the frame, the crankcases would sometimes touch and vibrate the frame until it cracked! To top it all they sometimes had gear selector problems which would cause it to change from 4th straight into 1st! The tank was too small (17 ltrs) and the whole bike never really achieved the potentioal it could have done. Many of the problems were eventually sorted and the last of the 750's (the 750F) was probably the best of the bunch but it's 24 ltr fuel tank didn't make it so good looking. It was eventually replaced with the 850 but even that had gearbox problems.

HTH.
 
I had a couple of pals who bought these when they were first introduced. They were really hyped up by the press and it was awardede'bike of the year' before it had really been made available to the public. It turned out to be a bit of a nightmare with probelems from it's hyvo primary chain which wore out, taking chunks out of the crankcase. Then swarf got in the oil causing untold damage. The pistone rings also gave trouble and the middle cylinder would seize if the oil level dropped even a tiny bit. The early bikes also wore out their points at an alarming rate and needed constantly adjusting. This was cured on later models by fitting electronic ignition. The engine mounts in some cases were known to settle . As it was mounted so close to the frame, the crankcases would sometimes touch and vibrate the frame until it cracked! To top it all they sometimes had gear selector problems which would cause it to change from 4th straight into 1st! The tank was too small (17 ltrs) and the whole bike never really achieved the potentioal it could have done. Many of the problems were eventually sorted and the last of the 750's (the 750F) was probably the best of the bunch but it's 24 ltr fuel tank didn't make it so good looking. It was eventually replaced with the 850 but even that had gearbox problems.

HTH.

And as Basil Fawlty would reply - "Otherwise OK ?"
 


Back
Top Bottom