OK, I have no problem with smut, sex, debauchery or other kinky shenanigans. Anything that happens between two consenting, informed adults is nobondy's business but theirs, therefore I see no problem per se in the generation of sexual imagery.
I work to deal with the effects of sexual abuse and to support victims/catch offenders. There is no correlation between not wanting people to be abused and not wanting sex to exist. The fact that you think I conjure up sexual imagery, does not mean my position on sexual abuse is diminished. If you think it does, please show how, because your line of reasoning confuses me.
I have some sympathies with that argument, but for me it is simply a word. I guess the juvenile part of me likes the fact that some people don't like it, which makes it more attractive, but I don't see it as any different to calling someone a pussy (or pussyhole, as the saggy waistband generation are prone to say), for example. Both terms referring to vagina. One is inexplicably viewed as worse than the other, even when they are used in the same way.
