No way I would consider that.
Don't get me started.
I'm insured with them. It is piss-taking to be honest.
I have two bikes on the policy. Takes a while to work this out, but one is insured as garaged (and it is always garaged at night, the few times it wasn't I literally slept in the van with it...) the other one is insured on the driveway, as that one spends some time garaged and some time on private land (comparable to a driveway for insurance purpose) so I went for that on the contract.
I wrote on another post that the "when in use" or "when travelling" clause for overnight theft is extremely vague.
And I don't like "vague" when I'm paying a couple grand a year to insure the bikes.
The fact that insurances consider only lock ups as garages is another piss taking especially if you live in a city where you will probably have access to underground residential parking and having a lock up means being a millionaire.
Underground parking where other people (other residents from the building) will have access is considered "on the road".
Being forced to underwrite a fully comp policy, and straight away refuse to quote only for third party and fire and theft is more bullshit.
I'm not discussing the price. I know that in London insurance prices are high. Insurance is a business, not a charity. I just don't really like being forced to buy products I don't want (fully comp) or at least I'd like to see the price difference and then make a decision based on that (I know that fully comp can be cheaper sometimes).