"Never put your 'bike anywhere your brain wan't five seconds earlier"
Some great input here, thank you Giles, Harry the Cat and Magnet
Some great input here, thank you Giles, Harry the Cat and Magnet
"Never put your 'bike anywhere your brain wan't five seconds earlier"
He clearly listened to your wise words...
If Mick is who I think he is, he interviewed me for the IAM RoadSmart National Training Team last year, and yes, he is a nice chap.Being a National Observer/Local observer assessor i have to do the assessment every three years. It is done by RQM Mick Kinghorn, a nice chap from geordie land.
I'm not quite sure what the IAM is saying there. The NO qualification has to be much tougher than the simple "ordinary" test because not only do you have to demonstrate a very high standard of riding you also have to observe and pick holes in the examiners ride too. The Masters is even tougher with little or no leeway for even minor errors.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Giles thanks for that detailed explanation - it makes a lot of sense although I suspect that most of us would not be able to keep up that level of focus for mile after mile - on the otherhand if you do it as your day job then I guess it becomes almost second nature.
Not sure the IAM knows what it's saying there. I think the bottom line was we're waiting for Surety's number crunchers to do the maths and tell us the answer. The 'not a full test' had the smell of a get out.
As for the Masters my own view, corroborated to some extent by the former Head of Standards of the IAM, is that it was designed as a marketing tool to get members to part with money for a better badge. Certainly some of the early 'mentoring' was suspect imo. It's been saved I think by the examiners who have a fair idea what a standard should be but I'd still advise anyone taking it to seek out a 'mentor' they know and trust rather than paying for mentoring from an unknown quantity.
If Mick is who I think he is, he interviewed me for the IAM RoadSmart National Training Team last year, and yes, he is a nice chap.
Giles thanks for that detailed explanation - it makes a lot of sense although I suspect that most of us would not be able to keep up that level of focus for mile after mile - on the otherhand if you do it as your day job then I guess it becomes almost second nature.
It does require a major mental shift in how you think about your riding and practice, practice, practice. If you apply the skills every time you go out on the bike then like any other skill it will become an unconscious competency.
I would be arguing with their 'system' all the time
Now there's a surprise!
Agreed, I am a Masters mentor but unfortunately no riders in my neck of the woods are willing to stick their necks out to do it. Incidentally my mentor was my local IAM examiner.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We all do stuff in our own way, I learn, I am not taught
i don't ski and never have been. if I were to go, I'd want black and white instruction from my ski instructor. 'When you ride across a cambered surface like this ... weight this leg' 'when you want to turn right ... bend this knee' ... or whatever you should do !
We all do stuff in our own way, I learn, I am not taught
..............................
I have been riding since 1974 and apart from occasional reading and a Bikesafe course with the Cambridgeshire police a few years ago I have never done any 'advanced training', I would be arguing with their 'system' all the time, I have to learn in my way