A glitch in a bespoke (handmade) route

Doc

English and Proud
UKGSer Subscriber
Joined
Nov 22, 2018
Messages
23,014
Reaction score
22,255
Location
Slawit
I have copied and edited this post into the GPS section, not least as:

A. It saves derailing Doc’s trip report.

B. It might well be handy to others.


Richard

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ay ‘up, there’s a glitch in t’ route:

IMG_1061.jpeg


Let’s ‘ave a butcher’s, as they say:

IMG_1063.jpeg


I’ll mend it f’ thee:

IMG_1064.jpeg

IMG_1065.jpeg



There, all done.


Top tip #417 and #418

A. Always check the route.

B. If there is an odd glitch, take a look to see why and try to mend it. It’s usually possible.

:beerjug:
 
Last edited:
Your a good un. I always put avoid dirt roads but noted for future.

That’s an instruction that the software will ignore, if you deliberately place a shaping point on an unmade road.

You can see this at work in your route:

A. Google street view shows that point 42 is on some sort of unmade road.

IMG_1067.jpeg

B. Shaping point 43, was across a bridge over some sort of creek, connected to 42 by what seems to be unmade roads.

IMG_1068.jpeg

IMG_1069.jpeg

C. Due to your avoidance setting, the dumb (but very clever) software, did its best to join 43 to 42 AND avoid any more unmade road. The only way it could do this was to turn you around at point 42 and take you on the loop to point 43. In short, it simply did exactly what you had asked it to do.

D. I forced the route to avoid creating the loop, by very simply moving point 43, closer to point 42. I could also have done it by using MyRoute’s ‘off road’ tool, between points 42 and 43. This would have created a navigable straight line line between the two points; crude but effective.


PS MyRoute recommends having a shaping point every 5 km / 3 miles. That alone would probably not have avoided the software creating the loop, but it remains very good advice. See the sticky in the GPS section. The sticky also highlights the importance of checking routes, before using them. It will save you getting to point 42 and then shouting at the dumb device (which can’t hear you) and questioning its parentage, as it’s now asking you to turn around and go on a bloody big loop.

:beerjug:
 
Last edited:
That’s an instruction that the software will ignore, if you deliberately place a shaping point on an unmade road.

You can see this at work in your route:

A. Google street view shows that point 42 is on some sort of unmade road.

B. Shaping point 43, was across a bridge over some sort of creek, connected to 42 by what seems to be unmade roads.

C. Due to your avoidance setting, the dumb (but very clever) software, did its best to join 43 to 42 AND avoid any more unmade road. The only way it could do this was to turn you around at point 42 and take you on the loop to point 43. In short, it simply did exactly what you had asked it to do.

D. I forced the route to avoid creating the loop, by very simply moving point 43, closer to point 42. I could also have done it by using MyRoute’s ‘off road’ tool, between points 42 and 43. This would have created a navigable straight line line between the two points; crude but effective.


PS MyRoute recommends having a shaping point every 5 km / 3 miles. That alone would probably not have avoided the software creating the loop, but it remains very good advice. See the sticky in the GPS section. The sticky also highlights the importance of checking routes, before using them. It will save you getting to point 42 and then shouting at the dumb device (which can’t hear you) and questioning its parentage, as it’s now asking you to turn around and go on a bloody big loop.

:beerjug:
Ok thanks and noted.
 
That’s an instruction that the software will ignore, if you deliberately place a shaping point on an unmade road.

You can see this at work in your route:

A. Google street view shows that point 42 is on some sort of unmade road.

View attachment 426987

B. Shaping point 43, was across a bridge over some sort of creek, connected to 42 by what seems to be unmade roads.

View attachment 426988

View attachment 426989

C. Due to your avoidance setting, the dumb (but very clever) software, did its best to join 43 to 42 AND avoid any more unmade road. The only way it could do this was to turn you around at point 42 and take you on the loop to point 43. In short, it simply did exactly what you had asked it to do.

D. I forced the route to avoid creating the loop, by very simply moving point 43, closer to point 42. I could also have done it by using MyRoute’s ‘off road’ tool, between points 42 and 43. This would have created a navigable straight line line between the two points; crude but effective.


PS MyRoute recommends having a shaping point every 5 km / 3 miles. That alone would probably not have avoided the software creating the loop, but it remains very good advice. See the sticky in the GPS section. The sticky also highlights the importance of checking routes, before using them. It will save you getting to point 42 and then shouting at the dumb device (which can’t hear you) and questioning its parentage, as it’s now asking you to turn around and go on a bloody big loop.

:beerjug:
What do you mean unmade road ?
I tell thee, that’s a major highway in these parts lad. 😅
 
What do you mean unmade road ?
I tell thee, that’s a major highway in these parts lad. 😅

:jes


There are some here that moan about all the roads in Belgium…. Unrideable, apparently. It must be a very small ‘a’ on their Adventure (with a capital A) bike.

PS It reminds me of the little roads in north east France / Flanders, which I enjoy. Not because they are “Great roads, mate” but because they are different from the A406 North Circular.

:beerjug:
 
Last edited:


Back
Top Bottom