Another cracking 1200GS Watercooled Adventure review......
- Thread starter y2blade
- Start date
Bike magazine's review said that if you don't intend to cross continents (thus perhaps valuing the extra fuel capacity) it's not worth bothering with over the vanilla alternative.
Who's to say they ain't right?
Who's to say they ain't right?
They say the handling isn't as good as the standard GS 
They say the handling isn't as good as the standard GS
I agree it wont be, its the difference between handling a fat bird or a fit bird, we all know the fit bird is more nimble and flexible
Fuel is like horsepower, you can't have too much of it 
.
.Lots of fuel is fine but unless all your mates have a GSA you end up stopping when the one with the smallest tank range needs to fill up, generally about 150 miles on sports bikes.
You end up carrying all the extra weight for no benefit. I have no desire to sit on a bike non stop for 7 or 8 hours, even when we travel to Europe , and don't know anyone apart from some trans world explorers that actually do. Cup of coffee and stretch the legs after 3 or 4 hours is more my style
You end up carrying all the extra weight for no benefit. I have no desire to sit on a bike non stop for 7 or 8 hours, even when we travel to Europe , and don't know anyone apart from some trans world explorers that actually do. Cup of coffee and stretch the legs after 3 or 4 hours is more my style
Snap.....I like my bikes the way I like my women
Snap.....I like my bikes the way I like my women
Leaky, temperamental and unreliable? Oops, sorry, just noticed the 'onda logo. Boring and ugly then?
Similar threads