Anyone know anything about this bike?
1150 Adv - HT53UHM
1150 Adv - HT53UHM
Curious
- Thread starter Rev Chuck
- Start date
- Status
garfield
Registered user
Anyone know anything about this bike?
1150 Adv - HT53UHM
As a useful tip, if you had named this thread Bi Curious I think you would have had loads of hits, look what Fanum did to get the punters out his thread today.....
As a useful tip, if you had named this thread Bi Curious I think you would have had loads of hits, look what Fanum did to get the punters out his thread today.....
So you've seen the bike, you don't know who it belonged to, I guess. Hey ho!
Uinneag
Guest
Sorry Chuck don't know he haw aboot the bike.
Is one considering a new mode of transport
Is one considering a new mode of transport
Deleted account rno
Guest
As a useful tip, if you had named this thread Bi Curious I think you would have had loads of hits, look what Fanum did to get the punters out his thread today.....
FFS Garfield. Gie it a rest. I think we a' get the message.
Does this help... 
The vehicle details for HT53 UHM are:
Date of Liability 01 03 2009
Date of First Registration 15 01 2004
Year of Manufacture 2004
Cylinder Capacity (cc) 1130CC
CO2 Emissions 0g/Km
Fuel Type Petrol
Export Marker Not Applicable
Vehicle Status Licence Not Due
Vehicle Colour SILVER
Vehicle Type Approval null
The vehicle details for HT53 UHM are:
Date of Liability 01 03 2009
Date of First Registration 15 01 2004
Year of Manufacture 2004
Cylinder Capacity (cc) 1130CC
CO2 Emissions 0g/Km
Fuel Type Petrol
Export Marker Not Applicable
Vehicle Status Licence Not Due
Vehicle Colour SILVER
Vehicle Type Approval null
Does this help...
The vehicle details for HT53 UHM are:
Date of Liability 01 03 2009
Date of First Registration 15 01 2004
Year of Manufacture 2004
Cylinder Capacity (cc) 1130CC
CO2 Emissions 0g/Km
Fuel Type Petrol
Export Marker Not Applicable
Vehicle Status Licence Not Due
Vehicle Colour SILVER
Vehicle Type Approval null
Mike, thanks for that. I kinda guess I was wondering if anyone was previous owner, or knew the previous owner - that kind of thing.
Nice bike. Now if I can pursuade my delightful and exceptional wife this evening... Of course if I cannot she would be neither of the aforementioned, just special.
The non-offended Chuck
Uinneag
Guest
I'll say a wee prayer fur ye
Ah only ken the Kaflik wans mind
Ah only ken the Kaflik wans mind
I'll say a wee prayer fur ye
Ah only ken the Kaflik wans mind
You sir, are a bad man.
The wee free's cannae be havin much success then?
Hebby
Registered user
The "Wee Frees" are far too modern and easy going. The Free Presbyterians are the boys !
Uinneag
Guest
You sir, are a bad man.
I'll tell ye a funny story about that when I see ye next just remind me of scones and cream
I think that the "Wee Frees" are the Free Presbyterians, as opposed to the Free Church of Scotland, of whom there are slightly more of, but less than the Church of Scotland. Political BS in the church....
I'll tell ye a funny story about that when I see ye next just remind me of scones and cream
Certainly. Will they accompany the story? Do I bring my own, or are you the provider?
Uinneag
Guest
I think that the "Wee Frees" are the Free Presbyterians, as opposed to the Free Church of Scotland, of whom there are slightly more of, but less than the Church of Scotland. Political BS in the church....
Certainly. Will they accompany the story? Do I bring my own, or are you the provider?
I'll bring the scones and cream you bring a haddy and a pan loaf
Hebby
Registered user
Na The "Wee Frees" are the Free Church of Scotland or Free Church of Scotland (Continuing) et al. The Free Presbyterians ("Susaders" )are the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland from whence all the others eminated.
As previously stated they are altogehter more fundamental.
Na The "Wee Frees" are the Free Church of Scotland or Free Church of Scotland (Continuing) et al. The Free Presbyterians ("Susaders" )are the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland from whence all the others eminated.
As previously stated they are altogehter more fundamental.
Presbyteriansm was restored in Scotland in 1690.
Church of Scotland (Presbyterian)established.
Free Church of Scotland established in 1843 at what is commonly called "The Disruption" when a whole bunch of ministers left the Church of Scotland over patronage. They remained Presbyterian in church government.
Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland established in 1892 when there was a split in the Free Church.
In 1929 the act of Union took place between the Free Church of Scotland and the Church of Scotland, which is now known as the Church of Scotland. Some of the Free Church did not unite, and they remain as the Free Church.
And in the 1980's & 1990's there continued to be uncertainty within the Free Church and Free Presbyterians which brought about the starting of the Free Church Continuing, and the Association of Presbyterian Churches.
And I accept your comments about the wee free being more local to the situation 'n'all.
The above is for anyone else who is interested.
Thanks for all your advice and helpful hints. Me completely unoffended.
If I could remember how to, I would close this thread. I'll get a mod to do it.
Absolutley none taken. Sometimes we shoot ourselves in the foot without too much if any outside help.
A quick question Charles, is the Free Presbyterian Church in Scotland the same church as Ian Paisleys Free P's over here?
If you want the thread closed I can do that for you if you wish.
If you want the thread closed I can do that for you if you wish.
Marjorie Proops
Guest
Is this a Monty Python sketch?
- Status
Similar threads
