GS or GSA ??

  • Thread starter Thread starter stealth
  • Start date Start date

stealth

Guest
As I will be looking at the 1200 as soon as I can (unfortunately a number of yrs) I was considering the fact of....Do I get a GS or pay extra for the adventure ?

Now 85% of my riding will be on the road but I dont want to rule out the fact of going offroad...nothing extreme though like charlie and ewan style.

Do I really need to go for the adventure or not.
What are the major differences and is the engine different?
 
I would say - go for the Adventure, if:

a) You think the extra tank capacity is important

b) You are happy with the increased bulk/weight.


You need to test ride both (ride the standard GS first) and then decide.

Al :)

Oh yeah - bigger screen on the Adv can make a big difference (as John says below)
 
Personally I thought the GSA felt better on the road compared to the GS, less "flighty". Extra fuel capacity is useful at times. What helped swing it the GSA's way was adding crash bars, extra lights, spoked wheels, decent screen etc made the cost difference not a lot.

HTH.
 
Back in Oct when I purchased my GSA, I was definately going for the GS instead, but after taking the wife for a test run on both, the GSA won handsdown.
For me it was better handling ( with 2 up) and presense of the bike, for her it was more comfortable, even with the extra height to get on the back seat. Been to France on it for a week of touring, and the decsion I am glad to say was the correct one. Excellent bike.
dxtans
 
Do you really mean that it's several years before you have to decide? If so, things may well have changed. You may be looking at a very different 1200 capacity bike, if indeed it's a 1200 at all.

If you are looking today:

It depends on what you want, as ever. I have owned both the vanilla and GSA versions and (for a while) both at once.

When I bought the vanilla bike the GSA had not been released. I clocked up 18,000 miles in a year, mostly in Europe and on one trip to Morocco. This was spent 95% on roads with either BT020 tyres or Dunlop Trailmax's, the 'halfway between' tyre. Both types of tyre could cope quite happily with 'off roading' on gravel or broken roads in Morocco and in Spain / France. The tank range is good enough for most things, the bike 'hoons around' as evidenced by the three track days I did on the thing.

I switched to the GSA because of the type of riding I do. I do not ride that much in the UK at all. I live in central London. I have no need to commute on a bike, as I walk to work. If I want to go anywhere in Town I can use public transport, call a taxi or take the car; it is so much easier. Most of my riding is holidaying in Europe, with many days over 300 miles on D or N roads. I like the increased tank range; when my mates stop for fuel I can miss every other fuel stop, near enough. This gives me perhaps 15 minutes to relax whilst they faff about. I like the larger build of the bike, that it is a bit heavier (but no stronger really), the OE luggage is good (but so is the vanilla bike's) and easy to use. I like the bigger screen but never seem to drop it down. After 30,000 miles in two and a half years, I have got used to it and can, if I want to, take it up the same gravel tracks on its hybrid Anakee tyres, without too much drama.

If I was just using a bike for charging about the UK at weekends, a bit of a commute (perhaps) and doing perhaps 5 to 7,500 miles a year, with a European holiday lobbed in now and again, I would go for the vanilla bike. It is cheaper and more than capable.

If I was doing only longish tours and several of them in a year, I would look carefully at the GSA.

Whatever I did, if I had never ridden a BuMW or a 1200, I would certainly ride both a couple of times, making use of dealers' demo versions or mates' bikes, before parting with my cash.
 
I like the increased tank range; when my mates stop for fuel I can miss every other fuel stop, near enough. This gives me perhaps 15 minutes to relax whilst they faff about.

More like 45 when in the company of the ballpoint pen and plastic tubing ....:D
 
buy th gsa

I have just recently bought a `08 gsa from the guys at bahnstormer. I test road both bikes first. I am so glad i bought the adventure. Its got a lot more presence on the road. And customers to my dad`s garage all coment on it. Also when riding it you feel king of the road and the countryside.

:D:D:D:D:thumb2
 
Thanks everyone for your comments and advice so far....
I was a little more pursueded towards the adventure and believe that if I bought the basic GS I would only yearn for the adventure
 
Owned a GSA from 06.

I ride GS every time it gets serviced as a loan bike and hate it.

I have got used to not getting any wind buffeting.
 
More like 45 when in the company of the ballpoint pen and plastic tubing ....:D


Somehow I just knew that was coming.......:D

The fountain of fuel moment will live with me forever and there is always time for a bit of packing.....

408202751_cCe8c-L.jpg
 
I too am struggling with whether to buy GS or GSA. I have ridden both a few months ago and I think I need to do so again. I prefer the GSA to look at but I've got to square the fact that I'm a real cut across country merchant and I steer clear of motorways or main roads where I can. Indeed on my 4 recent trips to Portugal, Spain, Italy etc I did not use a single mile of motorway, just used backroads.
So to get to the point, what is a GSA like on little roads, where the riding is involving and where you are blasting from bend to bend. And what about in the wet on small roads ? Sounds like the standard GS is what I want but still I cannot shake the GSA out of my mind.
 
So to get to the point, what is a GSA like on little roads, where the riding is involving and where you are blasting from bend to bend. And what about in the wet on small roads ? Sounds like the standard GS is what I want but still I cannot shake the GSA out of my mind.

I haven't ridden either variant with the new suspension, so I can only voice an opinion about the 05 and 06 variants.

A GSA is fine on all sorts of roads and corners well, no matter how 'involving' the bends. It = like most BuMW's - takes a few miles to get used too, first time out, that's all. Most of my riding is on D (minor) roads in Europe; I would like to think I do not slouch about, nor go namby-pamby through the bends, loaded or unloaded.

Obviously the vanilla GS is lighter (10 odd litres more of fuel on a full tank weighs something, after all) so it spins forward a little bit quicker but not much.

After 30,000 miles the suspension is shot on my GSA. It has started to wallow quite badly. So a set of Ohlins is going on in the new year, courtesy of the good folk at MCT in Suffolk. Expensive, but I do a lot of miles.

I too am struggling with whether to buy GS or GSA. I have ridden both a few months ago and I think I need to do so again. I prefer the GSA to look at but I've got to square the fact that I'm a real cut across country merchant and I steer clear of motorways or main roads where I can. Indeed on my 4 recent trips to Portugal, Spain, Italy etc I did not use a single mile of motorway, just used backroads.

Both bikes will do all types of roads quite happily, as will just about any modern motorcycle.

Ride both. Make your mind up. It's your bike and money, not ours.
 
If you've got the cash for the GSA, do a back to back test. The GS is the lighter more flickable bike, the GSA is the better tourer, but equal amount of fun to be had on both. I chose the GSA because:
1) It had better weather protection
2) Uber tank range for a bike (I hate filling up)
3) I'd had the GS

All minor points - if they didn't make the GSA, I'd be on the GS and loving it.
 
There are a number of threads asking this very question. :D
I have an 05 GS, cos I is a shortarsed weakling. I have never ridden a GSA, but have ridden with a few, both on and off road.
I'm perfectly happy with my choice, and have yet to have been disadvantaged by it. :thumb
Just my twopennorth.
Mark
 
I'm perfectly happy with my choice, and have yet to have been disadvantaged by it. :thumb

Why would you be? :nenau

Essentially the same bike just one has a little more of a few things.
If you have no need for the little more you won't find the standard bike lacking.

If however you want a longer range you will, or want most of the extras the GSA comes with anyhow you might as well get it, unless you are a shortarse.
 
The extra premium for the Adventure is worth paying for the extras you get eg spokes, crash bars, monster tank.
 
Why would you be? :nenau

Essentially the same bike just one has a little more of a few things.
If you have no need for the little more you won't find the standard bike lacking.

If however you want a longer range you will, or want most of the extras the GSA comes with anyhow you might as well get it, unless you are a shortarse.

Says it all, really. :thumb2
 


Back
Top Bottom