Warthog said:
All things being equal, a sports bike will be faster than a GS on a tarmac surface: its what they're built for...... QUOTE]
No dispute there, but the topic was cornering. I may be a bit off course here, but do the width of the handlebars as well as centre of gravity etc something to do with handling? Whilst I accept most points on this wonderful topic

most F1 bikes seam to have much wider bars than standard 600's and 1000 sports oriented bikes. The other point, as I have not read the article in question, were all the bikes tested using the same tyres
Hello Geoff 2,
Like yourself, I haven't read the article in question so I am lost on the specifics, but of the bikes that I have owned, I have always found that wider handlebars seem to make a bike easier to manoevre (Honda Dommie 650 SM, TDM 850). This is particularly true of bikes whose steering geometry was not initially designed for quick steering. For example the 19" front on a GS would be a git to contend with if the bars were the same as one a dinky 600. Centre of gravity also play a part as does the angle of the forks in relation to the frame of the bike. The Buells one of the other members mentioned earlier have very steep headrace angles and therefore tip in really fast. It seems despite a big lump of a motor, they have the chassis and suspension to match (shame about the reliability).
Of the two points I made earlier, I think rider ability is by far the bigger factor: I remember going round the outside of sports bikes (blades, ducatis etc) on my crappy B reg XBR 500 that I commuted on

, but I also remember getting equally stuffed by someone on something as benign

as I gave it all I had on a 1000 sports missile (the git).
For me its a question of getting comfortable and confident on the bike I own and as I get used to my GS, I am getting more used to its handling abilities, which as I said before are very respectable for a bike of this size and category. Let the fun times roll...only not too fast...and with plenty of warning, for now!