GS 1200 TE Test Ride Verdict

Status
Not open for further replies.

dongleplonk

Registered user
Joined
Jan 3, 2011
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
Location
Bristol
I have a 2011 GS, all sorted, now 25k touring miles with 5000 commuter miles thrown in. Love the bike, done lots to it to make it 'my own' but was keen to try the new GS 1200 Adventure WC (TE Spec).

Conditions: Very Wet
Ride Time: 1.5 hours
Roads: Motorway, lanes, A and B roads. Surfaces all good quality


1. Looks - love it. It's now better looking than the Triumph - it's closest rival in my humble opinion. But again, this is just my opinion. 9/10.
2. Engine - magic. The old GS, I felt, although adequate, was a little short on power when fully loaded. Not excessively but on occasion I would have liked just a bit more poke. Don't get me wrong my bike is perfectly pokey enough but when i reminisce about the old blackbird days, I sometimes would like a bit more of that grin factor. But the new GS was excellent in terms of power. Again not too much as to be ridiculous but it pulls well in all gears and in all rev ranges. In dynamic mode, it's genuinely fun and puts a smile on your face. 10/10
3. Tyres - the tyres are fab. Anakees. I know this from doing 7k miles on my own and still have 4.5mm left on the rear! Sometimes a bit noisy but hey, I still prefer the longevity. Glad to see Anakees on the new GS as standard. 10/10
4. Plastics - reasonable as far as I could see. Pretty sturdy all round. Not sure on the protection effectiveness of the winglets etc as there seemed to be quite a lot of water splashes behind the screen etc. Important to those of us who attach phones behind the screen and want that protection - but probably not enough to worry even to most rubbish case. The blue version of the bike, the tank colour shade doesn't match the seat colour very well. Seems that could have been done better. Many of the plastic items were intentionally flexible - I don't see an issue with that though. 7/10
5. Screen - it is small, too small. Maybe even 6 inches lower than my old GS. Of course the design may have alleviated the need to have a large screen but the protection simply wasn't there. Even with the full adjustment in effect. It was also very flexible - on the verge of flimsy. I assumed that was again by design but what it does mean is, BMW do not recommend attaching a deflector. This is a problem for me as I remove mine when it suits me - warmer weather, want better view in the mountains etc. So a replacement screen is needed if you want more protection (reports of those being 'flexible' to!). I fiddled with the adjuster which you can do while riding along if needed and it certainly was effective - if you want even more wind that is. 3/10
6. Noise - tyre noise aside, the bike is pleasantly quiet. A nice bark from the exhaust when you request it but otherwise pretty good for the times when you want to concentrate on the view. 8/10
7. Power Sockets - only one. I find I need two so I'd have to fit another. 4/10
8. Compartments - there are a couple to put your credit card but not really any others. So you'll probably end up buying supplementary tool boxes/number plate boxes. 4/10
9. Seat - after 45 mins I was suffering pain. I only solved this on my own bike via a Touratech purchase so it looks like I'd have to do the same with this one. Disappointing. Then again, if I lost some weight, things might be different! 3/10
10. Protection - My boots were very wet at the end of the test ride. This is not the case with mine. But I suspect my front fender extender helps with this. But yet again, another purchase required. But the rear of my legs were also very wet and so was my 'seating region'. I guess there was a lot of water being thrown up by the rear wheel. Looking at the rear mudguard later, I suspect a Mudsling is required. I mentioned screen protection above. I did notice a reasonable amount of wind buffeting at motorway speeds but what the heck. A bigger screen would probably solve this anyway, but the noise level does increase nevertheless. Having said this, the only bikes that do better on this as standard are the RT1200 and K1600 - but I ain't buying one of them! 4/10
11. Handle Bar Risers - I need them as I have an old shoulder injury but of course my old ones don't fit the new bars. But this is fairly unique to me. NA.
12. Feet / riding position. I like it although feet fully adjust anyway. 8/10
13. Switch gear - I like the old indicator setup personally. The reach across the 'controller wheel' to the indicators was fairly long and since it does nothing unless the Nav V is attached, it's always on your mind. The rest of the switches are okish though. 7/10
14. Clocks and data - Nice layout without trying to look like the K16 or RT12. Clocks were pretty easy to see but the data items were a but tricky with the 'spacey' thin font. 7/10
15. Heated Grips - Surprised these didn't work like the K16 or the RT12 (using the controller and more settings). Still only two settings and the hottest simply wasn't hot enough. At 5 degrees, my fingers don't normally get that cold. 3/10
16. Hand guards - I think these need a mention. I believe them to be too small to be fully effective regarding wind / rain protection. Also if the bike takes a small tumble, I'm not sure they will stop the levers being snapped. 3/10
17. Vibration - certainly less by virtue of tighter tolerances. Although the old bike isn't really problematic anyway. 8/10
18. Roadholding - in the wet it was surefooted. No issues. Traction was good and no surprises. Cornering was precise and inspires confidence. Braking was certainly ok and I can confirm the ABS works! 9/10
19. Overall - I don't think another Adventure bike comes close to this but it's going to need significant mods to make it work like I like. BMW seemed to have built a machine that is pretty, pokey and appeals to the masses. 7/10.

If you agree or not, post responses if you feel inclined.

I'm going to have to test ride again in the dry where I can test the suspension and roadholding to a greater degree. I'll update this once done.
 
So are you buying one or just window shopping ! Ie would it be a worthy upgrade to what you already have !
 
hmmmm…well ,all the "negative "points for yourself are as you say "personal" you would have to purchase this that or the other to make the bike fit you. If you stripped all the extras of your current bike I'm sure your Markings and comments would be similar to above.

Buy it ..you know you want to
 
3/10 for the screen...cant agree with you there, on flimsiness or effectiveness, plus a wunderlich ergo screen spolier works a treat to improve things, despite what bmw say you can or cant do..

Seat is also fine too, thought mine did take time to soften up a bit.

No other adventure bike comes close but only 7/10.:nenau

You didnt mention the gearbox....quite good/crisp innit.

:thumb2
 
So are you buying one or just window shopping ! Ie would it be a worthy upgrade to what you already have !

Window shopping only. I need to convince myself of the build quality too after issues with my existing GSA.
 
3/10 for the screen...cant agree with you there, on flimsiness or effectiveness, plus a wunderlich ergo screen spolier works a treat to improve things, despite what bmw say you can or cant do..

Seat is also fine too, thought mine did take time to soften up a bit.

No other adventure bike comes close but only 7/10.:nenau

You didnt mention the gearbox....quite good/crisp innit.

:thumb2

Screen - I supposed I'm just used to mine. Flex means it's a little less subject to blustery winds but I just don't see the benefit. Regarding the spoiler being not recommended - I was advised there is significantly more stress on the fixings with a spoiler and my worry is should any issues occur with them after a spoiler is fitted, then the warranty may be compromised.

Seat - on inspection, the cover didn't fit closely. Yet on another new one on the show room, it did. Not sure if there was a problem but I was having doubts over quality. But my experience was based on the test ride only. The pain and numbness was there - what can I say?

Gearbox - you are right. I forgot to comment on that. I don't remember any issues with that at all. So it must have been excellent. :)
 
hmmmm…well ,all the "negative "points for yourself are as you say "personal" you would have to purchase this that or the other to make the bike fit you. If you stripped all the extras of your current bike I'm sure your Markings and comments would be similar to above.

Buy it ..you know you want to


I agree. But I was hoping BMW would make it better, not worse. Engine aside of course. Then me having to spend less on essential bits. But you are right, I do want to buy one but I'm reserving judgement until another test ride.
 
I agree. But I was hoping BMW would make it better, not worse. Engine aside of course. Then me having to spend less on essential bits. But you are right, I do want to buy one but I'm reserving judgement until another test ride.

Nigh on Impossible for BMW to make a bike to please and fit everyone….strip your current bike back to std, Sell all the bits of that easy on here or evilbay, then personalise he new to suit.

Due to lots to the GS being loaned out to RT riders last summer, there is quite a few really low mileage second hand ones at dealers . you will save a fair whack shopping around
 
Ooooh. Good advice on the loan machines. That might just be the thing that convinces me to move forward! Thx Chap.
 
Food for thought:clocks & headlight can be stolen from LCs ! ride it to check gearbox/clutch is ok,engine doesn't excessively vibrate,the electronics all work there's a lot of problems on these,maybe why plenty seem to be for sale low miles so soon ?
 
Good write up & also good points from other members.
Don't think I'll be parting with my hard earned on one, not that much better than the one it replaces - in my opinion of course,
 
Brilliant. 1.5 hours, and you've summed the whole bike up.:rolleyes:
 
I wonder if anyone can do a similar assessment? As Nutty says - 1.5 hrs is not really long enough to assess anything properly.
 
Well, I made a decision and bought the KTM1290 Super Adventure (SA) . I just couldn't help myself! Here are the basic differences, comparing only to the GSA...

GSA Pro's:

1. Protection - this is one of the important differences. Simply, the SA is not as good as the GSA. At certain temps I knew what I needed to wear to keep warm on the GSA. On the KTM you can add 2 degrees to the baseline. Your arms and thighs get quite a lot of wind blast and this seems to make all the difference.
2. Helmet noise - the same on both bikes but on the GSA I could use a wind deflector making it very quiet. Not one available for the SA yet.
3. Presence - The GSA has quite a bit more. I see them around and the new one does look the business. Ok the SA isn't exactly small but the GSA pips it.
4. Lighting - the GSA has fog lamps, the SA does not (option). So in terms of visibility, for me I would prefer them. Also the front headlamp is always on, on the GSA. The SA uses a daylight running light only. Not sure if you can switch dipped beam to permanently on yet though. Having said that, the SA lighting is really very good in terms of lighting up the road, the GSA was always a bit dimmer.
5. Seat - I've been moaning for yonks about the standard seat on the GSA. Eventually I bought a Touratech and after a while the pain went away. No 'special' seats available for SA yet. However, I recently found out I have a very enlarged prostate (!) which means my complaining was not really attributable to the seat. So not much more I can say about that then other than if you are suffering pain after 30 mins, please get yourself checked out :) !
6. Luggage - The GSA aluminium panniers outstrip the smaller and more difficult to use SA ones. You can pack the GSA ones more easily due to their more standard shape. Plus they are great to sit on! I think the SA panniers look better but sorry, they need to be more functional.
7. Drive - The GSA has shaft, the SA has a chain. Need I say more.
8. Fuel, range, mpg - the GSA is slight better on juice by about 5 mpg. But I did get 10 mpg better on a motorway run on the SA. So give the SA some gas and you'll use more fuel than the GSA, go steady on the motorway and you'll use less. But thinking about the engine (tolerances) and configuration then you might have worked that one out yourself!


SA Pro's:

1. Engine - having 160hp on tap is ace. Hardly been able to use it though and although I get a massive grin on my face when I do, I feel the GSA power was sufficient. Only for mad blasts do I find the SA's power and torque really useful. Having said that, being able to deal with switchbacks with ease by virtue of all that torque is a real benefit.
2. Cornering lights - I thoughts these were a fad, a gimmick. But I couldn't believe how effective they were when I first experienced their operation. Normally you are flicking on main beam to give yourself a good view on sweeping bends, then having to plunge yourself into a panic of darkness by switching off the main beam when cars appear in your view. But no need with the SA, the cornering lights light up the corners really well indeed.
3. Grip - The SA is unreal. No issues with bumps, corner chatter, slides, whatever. It really does cope with poor road surfaces very well. Under power, it's darn solid.
4. Ergonomics - Generally very much the same. Although I did have to fit risers on my GSA and yet the SA is all adjustable.
5. Clocks - I like the digital speedo. I always like them - even in cars, but there is also the analogue one too. Generally great all round and for me and being able to set your favourites is a real bonus. The GSA was pretty good but it did have less to display.
6. Switches - the SA is much better. I can actually reach the indicators and when I recently put the muffs on the bike I had no issues with accessing the switches blind.
7. Brakes - rather better on the SA. Feels very sure under heavy braking. Although the GSA is also fab in this regard, the SA just about trumps it because it deals with squirming back ends much better. The linked brakes are great and the configuration of having linked when using the just the front lever and rear only with the foot brake is the perfect offering.
8. Gears - the box is certainly better on the SA. Never missed a gear yet. Its more sure and refined. The taller 6th is great too so at faster motorway speeds you don't feel its rev'ing that bit too much.

In conclusion: The SA is a different bike. I don't think it can be compared to the GSA - only to the GS. Of course it deals with touring really well and has sufficient storage for travelling. There's enough hooks etc to pile on a tent, chair etc but I bought a tank bag to provide the same overall luggage capacity as the GSA. Daily, I travel on the motorway and through the centre of London. The SA is definitely more agile in traffic and blipping away from the sardine in the Porsche is always a pleasure.

So, ultimately, I miss my GSA. Definitely. I wish enough cash would have meant I could have kept both bikes - since as I realise despite it's poor fuelling, extra weight, tractor like engine, low power and lack of feel, it was a character. I knew it and it knew me. I swore at it and it moaned at me. Then again, the SA is refined, yet a blast, has perfect roadholding and poise. I'm still to grow to love it though. Maybe in time I will. Feels like a forced marriage at the moment yet she is rather sexy, fast and exhilarating so I suspect after a few tours and ups and downs together, we'll begin to know each other like my previous Wife and I did.
 
I felt that my recent test ride on the new GSA LC was a marked improvement in most areas of the bike, better engine which was noticeably more powerful and less vibey, maybe less character also mind.

Gears and brakes were great, not as smooth at changing gear as my 2010 GSA but not bad at all.

More agile and felt lighter, screen was poor but I'm comparing it to my givi airflow which was epic.
Hand guards poor, good for summer but not sure about the rest of the seasons in terms of protection.
Lights look better (didn't ride a night).
Overall I enjoyed it to the point of cancelling my order for the s1000xr! Will leave this alone for a couple of years I think!
 
Lets have some pics of her then Dongleplonk. I must admit im tempted by a test ride but for one theres a serious lack of ktm dealers near me and at 16k :mmmm....its obviously a whole chunk of cash and the 3 year resale value could be interesting, i wonder how they compare to BMW?
 
When I get a chance I'll post a pic. Take a test ride for sure before you commit. I do enjoy the bike tremendously, I just have a soft spot for my GSA :)
Resale values, I can't imagine they'll keep up with BMW but hey, lets see.
 
Lets have some pics of her then Dongleplonk. I must admit im tempted by a test ride but for one theres a serious lack of ktm dealers near me and at 16k :mmmm....its obviously a whole chunk of cash and the 3 year resale value could be interesting, i wonder how they compare to BMW?

Interesting point, but I'd suspect that resale value's on WC's won't be so high, unless trading in against another BMW :) This months BIKE Magazine has a test of the SA vs a 2015 GS TE, I'd have thought testing against a GSA May have made more sense as the KTM pretty much trounced it, which must have been tough to call as BIKE magazine always appeared to be a in the pocket of BMW in recent years.

I've had a test on an SA and was really impressed with it. I'm keeping the WC until the Warranty expires, but then will see what's on the table P/ex wise and may look harder at the KTM.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Back
Top Bottom