Demo'd the FJR in a processional ride with another guy demo'ing a Mille R and the shop bloke on an R1; it was erm, a quick ride!
Really liked the FJR except for one annoying thing and one unbearable thing. Firstly I ground out the peags around roundabouts (I'm 14st/198 lb) and secondly, like the previous posting, whatever height I put the screen it caused annoying turbulence (I'm 6ft 2"). Obviously many screens do, but the stock GS for instance is better and with a Cee Baileys it's even better. Afterwards I rode the Pan STX1300 and it was quality. Should have bought one but fears of depreciation saw me order a K1200GT prior to release. What a mistake!
Owned an R1150, ridden Adv and own an R1200GS. The 1150 is a great bike, especially compared with 80/100GS; but it's well balanced weight can still be felt and it lacks power on occasion. The Adv is the most comfortable if you can handle the extra height and for my money has the best stock screen. Another quality bike. The best, as they say, is left to last. Not quite as light and power compared with it's predecessor as BMW claim, but a decent stock screen, decent comfort and handling and brakes to leave any bike of similar ilk either present or before.
I like the idea of owning a MKII Jag, but I drive the latest Audi A3. You can't stop looking back with fond affection, but equally you can't stop progress; and the new R1200GS is a quantative and qualitative evolution over the 1150. If you own an 1150 you'd be crazy to upgrade, unless well healed, otherwise it's a no brainer.
STX1300, R1200RT, R1200GS - Quality; and I'm a Quality Manager!
