Why struggle, its the individuals choice as to whether you like something or not, life would be boring if we was all the sameMay be slightly OT.
I may appreciate the idea of a simpler solution. However, as it only takes two minutes to undo the two screws to unhook the windscreen I struggle to see why bother.

??????Oh, no 10% discount?![]()
May be slightly OT.
I may appreciate the idea of a simpler solution. However, as it only takes two minutes to undo the two screws to unhook the windscreen I struggle to see why bother.
??????
Not when you have a camera mount attached over the top it doesn't!
I'm not sure what camera mount you refer to. But at least the camera mount shown in posts above will probably not affect the removal of the windscreen. When I say windscreen, I refer to the main windscreen which is fastened to the frame by two screws…
Have a look at this video
But this whole thread is talking about the sub-screen, not the main windscreen! The main screen can be cleaned easily without removing it!
(besides, even if changing the hidden screen to a different design it will become just as dirty as before)I understand, but the post is about the uncleanable screen.
My point is, the uncleanable screen is far from uncleanable. If you remove the windscreen, you are able to clean the uncleanable screen with ease.
As for wanting a different design for the looks of it is a different matter. But if the motivation for a change is cleaning only, which the post header suggest, I'm simply offering advise on how to make the uncleanable cleanable.(besides, even if changing the hidden screen to a different design it will become just as dirty as before)
Sorry I think you are missing the point. As the standard sub-screen is clear plastic, it gets dirty on the back which shows on the front. Taking off the windscreen doesn't make cleaning the back of the sub screen much easier. As the replacement is solid black plastic, you only have to worry about the front!
As someone who commutes all year round in all weather, its well worth the change IMO!

Yep.
In that case I missed the point![]()
![]()