2015-17 R1200GS LC owners real-world reliability, driveshaft and Non-ESA experience.

Mike75

Registered user
Joined
Oct 5, 2026
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Location
Ireland
Hi all, new member from Ireland.
I’m 51, turning 52 shortly, and I’m looking at getting back into motorcycling after many years away. I rode when I was younger but never went through the full licence process at the time, so I’ll be starting properly and doing the full Category A route.
Realistically I’m probably around two years away from buying the bike I actually want, so I’m doing plenty of research beforehand rather than buying first and learning afterwards. The long-term plan is mainly two-up touring around Ireland and Europe with my partner, Steff, plus panniers/top box and normal touring luggage.
I’m not looking for advice on what learner bike to buy just yet — I’m trying to understand what ownership of the bikes I’m interested in is actually like once they’re 8–15 years old and have decent mileage on them.
At the moment my shortlist is headed by the Yamaha Super Ténéré, with the BMW R1200GS/GSA a very close second. If I go BMW, I’m particularly interested in roughly 2015–17 liquid-cooled R1200GS/GSA models, preferably standard height and ideally without Dynamic ESA. I’m happier with manually adjustable suspension and fewer very expensive electronic components.
My biggest question is long-term reliability, particularly the cardan/driveshaft and final drive. I know BMW introduced inspection/service measures and replacement schedules on these bikes, so I’d really like to hear from owners who have actually accumulated serious mileage.
What mileage did your original shaft reach? Has BMW replaced yours under the campaign? Have you needed another since? Any final-drive bearing or gearbox issues?
More generally, once these bikes get into the 80,000–150,000 km range, what genuinely expensive failures have you experienced beyond normal servicing and consumables?
Rider + passenger will be roughly 150 kg before riding gear and luggage, so I’m also interested in how the GS/GSA behaves properly loaded two-up over long distances.
If you were heading off tomorrow on a 3,000–5,000 km European trip, would you trust your bike without hesitation?
Looking forward to learning a bit from people who’ve actually lived with them. 👍
 
So the Cardan on a 2013 onwards 1200/1250 is replaced by BMW free of charge at 60000km. I just had mine done (2018 bike with now 42500 miles)

If a modern Boxer is well maintained, I would have no issues.... Indeed I just took mine to Romania over a 4 weeks and 5500 miles trip...
 
I've owned both your "top-2" - I owned a 2013 model (the first gen) SuperTenere 1200 "worldcrosser" edition from Dec 2014 to Dec 2018 and did about 35,000 miles on it in that time including a number if euro-tours.

I sold the Tenere on here to a chap from Ireland when, in December 2017, I bought a 10-month old 2016 model R1200GS Adventure from my local BMW dealer. I bought that with 3,000 miles on it and sold it with 41,000 earlier this year when I bought an R1300GSA from a friend.

Both were (are) superb bikes.

The Tenere had nothing but routine servicing in that time - oil, filters, plugs, air filter - it needed nothing and there were no faults. Its a much more "basic" bike than the GS. Has less power, carries its weight slightly higher - but on the plus-side ihe OE genuine Yamaha luggage is excellent and the bike feels sightlier "roomier" - in particular in the height between peg and seat. In STD form I found the spring to be weak when fully loaded (2-up & luggage) - the fitting of a Hyperpro spring to the std shock was one of the best things I did with that,

The GS is the more accomplished tourer - cruise control and ESA help with that (you're not going to find many without ESA by the way - almost the entire market in the UK is the 'TE model" which has it - oddly, my GS was the basic XE model - but even it had ESA specified as an option!) . I found the OE BMW luggage to be very good (others have mixed views). It was supremely comfortable for rider and passenger On the downside, the rear shock failed at 15,000 miles and was replaced as a "goodwill gesture" by BMW - the 2nd shock was fine during my ownership. it was 100% reliable otherwise and was serviced by BMW during the entire time I owned it. I never had a worry about the cardan shaft or driveline.

I'd be happy to answer any questions on those two bikes for you if you have any.
 
Late 2014 model R1200GSA te (utter pice of sh*t ESA never worked despite 3 front and 3 rear shocks in 32 months and 13,000 miles , crap gearbox even worse GSAP , 3 sets of left and 3 sets of right switchgear, multiple shaft drive gaiters .

Late 2017 model R1200GSA , bought a Basic which was specced up to be a te model except no ESA (hate the idea and the BMW execution ) , fantastic gearbox , no issues with switchgear or anything else except mine was one of a batch made in late 2017 to early 2018 that used a non branded ECU that failed at 14,000 miles in Austria . Replaced under Insured warranty .

With the 1200 I would say that the later you buy the better , other BETA testers have done the development for BMW..

UK market is odd regarding BMW's as everyone wants ESA and to get a non ESA it was always a factory order as from 2015 BMW UK never brought any into the UK as stock (that one was from BMW UK ).

Speaking to an Austrian dealer they claimed they always bought te (ESA) models as their hire bikes as it was what hirers expected but said that over 50% of their own customers bought non ESA bikes .

Do not discount the Super Tenere , the later ones are very well equipped for what you pay ,they are a competent ,reliable bike that ride better than the spec appears on paper . Just don't waste money on standard Yamaha luggage go for one with Givi, SW Motech or similar boxes
 
Good advice above

As Geekay says, suspension on these bikes can be fragile.... But.... For a reasonable sum, get them rebuilt by Lucasz at T-Tech suspension and they'll be great for years - I had mine done proactively before a big trip at 30000 miles
 
Good advice above

As Geekay says, suspension on these bikes can be fragile.... But.... For a reasonable sum, get them rebuilt by Lucasz at T-Tech suspension and they'll be great for years - I had mine done proactively before a big trip at 30000 miles
indeed yes - the "goodwill gesture" meant I got a new one fitted for £80 labour to remove (old) and refit (new) - otherwise I'd have been sending mine to Lucasz for a rebuild.

I'd agree with this being a good proactive measure on a higher mileage bike

Its also worth mentioning that when the shocks 'go' - the bike is almost unrideable - if had happened when "away" it would have been the end of the holiday! (or at best 'limping home' on motorway)
 
I'm going to counter one of the posts above by saying that (failure excluded) I thought the ESA was fabulous and worked a treat for handling load, stiffening in dynamic for a sportier ride and sorting out the preload for rider / passenger / luggage etc. It was really very good.

In addition - my 2016 model had up and down quick shifter (GSAP I think) which worked perfectly- up and down.
The 2016 model had the "slightly-revised" gearbox (not the original 2014-2015 one) - but not the "really-revised" (lol) gearbox of the Euro4 2017 models (identifiable by blue rings on the clocks).
worth nothing - the 2017-2018 Euro4 models are often considered the 'best' of the 1200's (- gearbox sorted, no TFT)
 
I've owned both your "top-2" - I owned a 2013 model (the first gen) SuperTenere 1200 "worldcrosser" edition from Dec 2014 to Dec 2018 and did about 35,000 miles on it in that time including a number if euro-tours.

I sold the Tenere on here to a chap from Ireland when, in December 2017, I bought a 10-month old 2016 model R1200GS Adventure from my local BMW dealer. I bought that with 3,000 miles on it and sold it with 41,000 earlier this year when I bought an R1300GSA from a friend.

Both were (are) superb bikes.

The Tenere had nothing but routine servicing in that time - oil, filters, plugs, air filter - it needed nothing and there were no faults. Its a much more "basic" bike than the GS. Has less power, carries its weight slightly higher - but on the plus-side ihe OE genuine Yamaha luggage is excellent and the bike feels sightlier "roomier" - in particular in the height between peg and seat. In STD form I found the spring to be weak when fully loaded (2-up & luggage) - the fitting of a Hyperpro spring to the std shock was one of the best things I did with that,

The GS is the more accomplished tourer - cruise control and ESA help with that (you're not going to find many without ESA by the way - almost the entire market in the UK is the 'TE model" which has it - oddly, my GS was the basic XE model - but even it had ESA specified as an option!) . I found the OE BMW luggage to be very good (others have mixed views). It was supremely comfortable for rider and passenger On the downside, the rear shock failed at 15,000 miles and was replaced as a "goodwill gesture" by BMW - the 2nd shock was fine during my ownership. it was 100% reliable otherwise and was serviced by BMW during the entire time I owned it. I never had a worry about the cardan shaft or driveline.

I'd be happy to answer any questions on those two bikes for you if you have any.
Thank you very much for the reply pal.
I'm kind of torn between the two really. I had thought of a wild card in there with maybe the Yamaha FJR1300A. But if rather the ADV.
The roads here in Ireland aren't great in the west, very poor quality when on the national and B roads and when you do go off the beaten track their even worse which is why Id prefer the ADV bikes.

I'll probably have a budget of about 8k when I do go to buy, as I'll need another probably 2-2.5k for gear for myself and herself, I don't want to skimp on that.
 
I had a 2016

not the best bike ive owned

The paint on the rear subframe went matt and rusty within a couple of years

Shock absorbers are only warranted to 30K and replacements even with a contribution from the mothership are north of £1200

As to relaibility , mine wasnt

in short

These are the following items that failed in 3 years of ownership

Fuel flap lock mechanism

Throttle grip assy

Throttle grip loom

Rear shock absorber

Camshaft sensor

Main ECU

Fuel pressure regulator

Throttle body assy

That was the last straw and i walked away

3 yeasr ownership of which 18 months offroad due to breakdowns & waiting for parts


Top tip, buy the last of the twin cams
 
Late 2014 model R1200GSA te (utter pice of sh*t ESA never worked despite 3 front and 3 rear shocks in 32 months and 13,000 miles , crap gearbox even worse GSAP , 3 sets of left and 3 sets of right switchgear, multiple shaft drive gaiters .

Late 2017 model R1200GSA , bought a Basic which was specced up to be a te model except no ESA (hate the idea and the BMW execution ) , fantastic gearbox , no issues with switchgear or anything else except mine was one of a batch made in late 2017 to early 2018 that used a non branded ECU that failed at 14,000 miles in Austria . Replaced under Insured warranty .

With the 1200 I would say that the later you buy the better , other BETA testers have done the development for BMW..

UK market is odd regarding BMW's as everyone wants ESA and to get a non ESA it was always a factory order as from 2015 BMW UK never brought any into the UK as stock (that one was from BMW UK ).

Speaking to an Austrian dealer they claimed they always bought te (ESA) models as their hire bikes as it was what hirers expected but said that over 50% of their own customers bought non ESA bikes .

Do not discount the Super Tenere , the later ones are very well equipped for what you pay ,they are a competent ,reliable bike that ride better than the spec appears on paper . Just don't waste money on standard Yamaha luggage go for one with Givi, SW Motech or similar boxes
Thanks for the reply pal.
These are the stories I need to hear to be fair. I suppose forums are always going to go 50/50 for and against.
A lot of the bikes I'm looking at here in Ireland at the moment are a mix of the TE/ESA spec and the Non ESA. To be fair their all in good nick with lowish mileage for their years.
Plus I'm a couple of years away yet from buying but I like going in eyes wide open.
I'll have maybe 8-9k to spend on a bike but I'd like minimal bells and whistles, the less electronics it has for me the better.
I'm a panel beater and working on cars for the last 28 years and I'm driving a 2008 Volvo XC70 D5 AWD Auto 1St generation of the P3 platform which is the platform all the newer ones were designed on.
I have the stronger engine and it's Euro 5 so it doesn't have all the emissions crap of the newer cars and is way easier to maintain, so I guess in effect I'm looking for the 2 wheeled equivalent. 🤦😂
 
I had a 2016

not the best bike ive owned

The paint on the rear subframe went matt and rusty within a couple of years

Shock absorbers are only warranted to 30K and replacements even with a contribution from the mothership are north of £1200

As to relaibility , mine wasnt

in short

These are the following items that failed in 3 years of ownership

Fuel flap lock mechanism

Throttle grip assy

Throttle grip loom

Rear shock absorber

Camshaft sensor

Main ECU

Fuel pressure regulator

Throttle body assy

That was the last straw and i walked away

3 yeasr ownership of which 18 months offroad due to breakdowns & waiting for parts


Top tip, buy the last of the twin cams
Thanks for the reply pal. Really appreciate it.
 


Back
Top Bottom