Sounds reasonable
Makes some interesting reading below, as it seems that it would basically change the normal GS into a Adventure height bike with stiffer springs, and still have the benefits of a normal GS, as 2 cms higher would actually be a bonus for me in suspension travel, as when bike is fully loaded 2 up and baggage, bike is at its limit.
https://advrider.com/f/threads/r1200gs-rallye-sport-suspension-on-road.1276043/
And just found this from BMW catalog
http://www.bmw-motorrad.com/_common/pdf/bike/en_2017/R1200GS_PI_ERO_web.pdf
Sport suspension Option code 547 Only available in BMW R 1200 GS Rallye version and option code 191 Dynamic ESA (Electronic Suspension Adjustment).
Interesting also
https://advrider.com/f/threads/2019...red-or-incoming.1340986/page-25#post-36619804
For 2019 ESA models...
The GS/GSA suspension modes are the same operationally. We don't know what if any differences BMW may have chosen to apply in software. I personally don't think there are any.
There are two different sets of ESA shocks with different travel, and perhaps other differences. One with (F) 210mm / (R) 220mm, one with (F) 190mm / (R) 200mm.
Ignoring low suspension bikes, those two sets of shocks are available on:
190/200 Stock GS Suspension
210/220 Stock GSA Suspension, GS HP Sports Suspension
The 20mm travel difference alters both the 'ride' the bike offers, as well as the geometry. The GSA and GS HP w/Sports Suspension have a slightly shorter wheelbase among other differences. The GS with stock suspension is more planted than the other two.
Keeping in mind that suspension is subjective, on pavement, with preload in AUTO mode, for this rider @ 300 w/gear, the 'comfort' in order from best to worst:
GSA
GS
GS w/Sports Suspension
Off pavement (gravel forest roads, pot holes, diversion trenches etc... With damping in Enduro, they are all three equally comfortable for me, with the extra 20mm being nice to have riding at speed over rough stuff.