Oops
Sorry about the large text on last post
Sorry about the large text on last post


I collect bikes, never seem to wanna sell the old ones when a new one comes along, so, I have a few without ABS, but after many miles on GS & GSA I still seem to lock the back wheel on sometimes the slightest incline or bit of dust, gravel or sand I can find, & the abs has done its job a lot quicker than I could even notice, on these big heavy & sometimes loaded bikes I think it's a MUST..!



Regardless of what some say on here, a used (late model) BMW without ABS will be harder to sell and worth less money. I never had ABS before I bought my GS, but its good to have and I'd not want to be without it. My answer is, don't buy it unless its A LOT cheaper and then expect it to stick when you want to sell it on.
yes i would my last 1200 was non abs and non servo, just very good brakes.
if on the otherhand it was going to be a keeperid rather have ABS in the long term, its just nice to know its there on cold dark wet nights
![]()
Spec'd my GSA last year specifically without ABS because I do intend it to be a keeper. Cheaper to buy, cheaper to maintain, easier for me to service once the warrantee expires. Also benefit by not having linked brakes. I've never had ABS but have ridden BMWs with it, including the very early ones and did find it kind of re-assuring but never felt like it was a must, just ride according to the conditions.
I also have an 1150 that doesn't have ABS either so part of my decision was based on not wanting one bike with and one without as braking in an emergency is a reaction rather than a considered process and needs to be ingrained.
I'd not buy a second hand BMW with ABS due to the expense of maintaining it as they get older.
Not really. Based on those principles, you'd wear a crash helmet in a car. Do you? Thought not. ABS is an unnecessary complexity on a motorcycle that provides a false sense of security. Biking should be about skills, concentration and focus not about driving aids.

So, given the choice, you wouldn't wear a seat belt in a car and would disconnect the airbags?
Yes, driving/riding well includes all the attributes you cite, but when you can increase your personal safety by using the passive safety systems that are available, what is the argument against?
![]()
Wrong argument. ABS doesn't increase personal safety (as seat belts, air bags, helmet, leathers etc do), it just stops the wheels locking up.

Wrong argument. ABS doesn't increase personal safety (as seat belts, air bags, helmet, leathers etc do), it just stops the wheels locking up.
Wrong argument. ABS doesn't increase personal safety (as seat belts, air bags, helmet, leathers etc do), it just stops the wheels locking up.
ABS - When they discovered it released the brakes their level of confidence was somewhat reduced.
Very true, had it happen to me a couple of times and it is very alarming
Now, I wouldn't purchase a bike with ABS, by choice..... unless I was forced to
Find a quiet, straight bit of road in the pissing rain and turn off your ABS - then brake as hard as you can from 50mph, you'll be amazed at the level of adhesion that modern tyres have, in the wet
Better to leave the ABS switched on and then brake as hard as necessary to activate the front wheel ABS. This will demonstrate how much grip there is, without throwing the bike down the road.Find a quiet, straight bit of road in the pissing rain and turn off your ABS - then brake as hard as you can from 50mph, you'll be amazed at the level of adhesion that modern tyres have, in the wet
Better to leave the ABS switched on and then brake as hard as necessary to activate the front wheel ABS. This will demonstrate how much grip there is, without throwing the bike down the road.
Find a quiet, straight bit of road covered in mud, diesel and pot holes, in the pissing rain and turn off your ABS - then brake as hard as you can from 50mph, you'll be amazed at the lack of adhesion that modern tyres have, in the wet