Airhead RT thoughts

Jon T

Active member
UKGSer Subscriber
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
245
Reaction score
5
Location
Sunny Warwickshire
My RT dilemma is different to Wrigsbys, so rather than adding to his thread and diverting its purpose, I thought I’d put this out there.

I’ve started to do a bit more touring on my bike, a 1988 R100GS. It’s enough for me for most trips, but on a 380 mile, cool and wet run back from Belgium last year took it out of me and I started to think I needed better weather protection for longer trips.

I may have overreacted, as in November I bought a fully loaded 2016 R1200RT. It’s a great bike for sure, but I have reservations about its size and weight, and I’m not sure I’ll be making use of all the extra performance. For context, I do most of my riding on the GS or old British bikes, and rarely get much above 70-80mph.

I don’t know why I didn’t think of it before, but I’m now wondering whether an airhead RT wouldn’t be a better fit for my needs. I guess I always thought they were a bit of an old man’s bike - but actually that’s way more appropriate now than it once was! I’d end up with a bike that’s 38kg (84lb) lighter, with the weather protection I’m after and all the speed I need. I would also be able to fix it myself for the most part, or take it to Mikeyboy if not, so avoiding the lottery that is the main dealer experience. I’m thinking of trying to find a late Monolever, as suspension, brakes and electrics were developed over time.

So my actual question - does anyone here use a R100RT for its intended purpose still? Is it up to the job of a bit of classic touring, but able to keep with motorway traffic if required? Anyone back to backed one with a R1200RT?

Thanks all
 
I know what you mean. BMW seem to suffer the same weight gain disease as all the other manufacturers. I’ve got a v85 tt motoguzzy. Garda odonnel or something like that. Rides like a airhead. Feels a bit like one too. JJH
 
Having ridden a water cooled R1200RT. The size and weight are not an issue especially if fitted with engine bars as if it does fall over it's not very far. I did it once on mine and found it easier to pick up than my R1150GS. I've ridden a R100RT and R80RT in period and an R80RT monolever in period and in my opinion the 800CC engine was way smoother than the 1000. Either will sit at motorway speed and the fairing is superb. At least as good as the R1200RT for weather protection. At 5'9" it was a bit of a stretch to see over the screen on the old airheads.
 
As you can see, the difference in weight is not that great. If you want comfortable all day touring then I'd stick with the 12RT. Just be careful at low speeds and think carefully about where and how you will park it!

2005 BMW R 1200RT

1739387208843.jpeg
Motorcycle Specifications
https://www.motorcyclespecs.co.za › model › bmw-r12...





BMW R 1200RT ; Dry Weight, 229 kg / 485.0 lbs ; Wet Weight, 259 kg / 570.9 lbs ; Fuel Capacity, 27 Liters / 7.1 US gal ; Reserve, 4 Litres / 1.0 US gal ;

BMW R 100RT Classic

1739387134966.jpeg
Motorcycle Specifications
https://www.motorcyclespecs.co.za › model › bmw-r10...





r100rt weight from www.motorcyclespecs.co.za
Wet Weight. 238 Kg / 525 lbs. Fuel Capacity. 24 Litres
 
As you can see, the difference in weight is not that great. If you want comfortable all day touring then I'd stick with the 12RT. Just be careful at low speeds and think carefully about where and how you will park it!

2005 BMW R 1200RT

View attachment 385100
Motorcycle Specifications
https://www.motorcyclespecs.co.za › model › bmw-r12...





BMW R 1200RT ; Dry Weight, 229 kg / 485.0 lbs ; Wet Weight, 259 kg / 570.9 lbs ; Fuel Capacity, 27 Liters / 7.1 US gal ; Reserve, 4 Litres / 1.0 US gal ;

BMW R 100RT Classic

View attachment 385099
Motorcycle Specifications
https://www.motorcyclespecs.co.za › model › bmw-r10...





r100rt weight from www.motorcyclespecs.co.za
Wet Weight. 238 Kg / 525 lbs. Fuel Capacity. 24 Litres
You’ve quoted spec for a 2005 RT,the OP has a 2016 bike I doubt it lost weight as it developed.
The mk1 1200 bikes were some of the lightest in their class back in the day.
 
:D
 
The fairings on both the RT and Rs models are substantial and heavy,
I don’t personally like the RT as being short the screen is always in my sight line,
A CS is considerably lighter and with a decent screen will be far more pleasant to ride at normal speeds
 
274 kg wet
Fai enough. I stand by my comment though ... if the priority is touring comfort, as it seems to be, then stick with the RT, be aware of the weight and ride accordingly.
 
The wet weight of the newer bikes includes the standard fit panniers. They are double skinned and heavy. Riding the bike with them off makes a considerable difference. They must weight the guts of 7-10 KG each empty. I dropped my 2014 wet head turning on gravel (near the Isle of Whithorn) and was surprised at how easily it went upright again. I didn't even take the (full of touring guff) panniers off. Looked it up the Wet head Panniers weigh 6KG each. (y)
 
when i rode a friends r80rt and his r100rt , i was disappointed that ...i still got wet , rain came through the grill , and upwards , and at my feet the fairing did fuck-all , it might as well not have been there !
i was drier on a cx500 with a Polaris fairing.
my 1150rt , is totally different , you sit in a bubble of dry air , you get wet when you slow down , but the fairing is so good .
 
The fairings on both the RT and Rs models are substantial and heavy,
I don’t personally like the RT as being short the screen is always in my sight line,
A CS is considerably lighter and with a decent screen will be far more pleasant to ride at normal speeds
Hey Mike, how’s it going. Don’t suppose you know where there’s a C-SECTION for sale? 😀
My first BMW at a tender age was actually a crashed Motorsport R100RS that I fitted a CS style fairing to. That was fine when I was in my 20’s, but I’m after a bit more protection than a CS fairing or my GS flyscreen provides for longer runs.

Cheers, Jon
 
when i rode a friends r80rt and his r100rt , i was disappointed that ...i still got wet , rain came through the grill , and upwards , and at my feet the fairing did fuck-all , it might as well not have been there !
i was drier on a cx500 with a Polaris fairing.
my 1150rt , is totally different , you sit in a bubble of dry air , you get wet when you slow down , but the fairing is so good .
Oh, interesting that you weren’t kept dry by the RT fairing!
 
I had a 100RT that I enjoyed a few years ago and like you say, I've been looking for others... My search has lost interest thoughts as people's expectations about price for a few rough bikes is way too high...
Mikeyboy is right though, the fairing is fiberglass so adds a fair bit of weight to the front end and obviously tempers it's blistering performance...👍😂
I had specific reasons (Spanish classic rally) but have been seeing later oilheads/KS at half the cash or less which are better bikes anyway.... It's a tough one and weirdly the hipster/tripster epidemic has only driven up prices of the remaining...🙄
 


Back
Top Bottom