Kave said:
The manual, are you crazy.
I agree it's not the best manual in the world. However, not reading the manual at all seems daft to me.
I know it's 'splitting hairs', but the manual doesn't say 'leave the bike for 10 minutes before checking'. And the owner who 'started engine and let it warm to 5 bars on the RID, switched off and left it undisturbed on its center stand' was asking to get false readings, and the manual specifically warns against doing this. Moreover, the manual gives a reason why 'He came back days later to find oil level had RISEN!.'
Big Lee, I agree with Kave & richie (and the manual!) that you should check the oil after a good run - ie the engine (and not just the oil) is at operating temperature. I don't agree with their 'wait 2 minutes.' The manual says 'at least 5 minutes' and that is what you should do. I do find that cold oil produces a lower reading than using the 'correct' method. The danger with checking the level when cold, is that you can overfill with oil. Hence the manual's "Checking the oil level after the engine has been run only briefly, or when it is not properly warm will falsify the reading and could lead to the engine being operated with the wrong quantity...'
The whole subject is bl**dy annoying, and that's why it keeps cropping up on this forum, and others. My last boxer was an RT, and that was far far worse. However, in the 6 months I've had the 1200, I've used the technique given in the manual every time I've ridden the bike, and had consistent readings throughout. Furthermore, I've observed the difference between readings hot & cold - exactly as stated in the manual.
So Kave, I'm not crazy. But I'll stick to the manual, thank you.