Contesting a parking ticket?

Appeal upheld ... maybe!

Today was the day. Got me best suit on and walked into the West Port clutching copies of the evidence for my appeal. I sent in the originals weeks ago and the actual hearing had been delayed on a couple of occasions. Once by me and once by "them".

Shown up to a pretty sparsely furnished office by a PA and there's a guy sitting in a pin stripe suit that just shouted "LAWYER". He introduced himself and we shook hands. All very amicable and casual.

"Rumpole" then explained his part in the proceedings and invited me to put my case, which I did.

His nibs listened politely to my bulsh ... sorry ... submission, making notes which amounted to a 1/2 page of A4. He then pushed back from the desk and lifted his own copy of the case file which included my own stuff and the Council's stuff. Coloured markers were all through it and I could see that sections had been highlighted. He had obviously done his homework and proceeded to tell me so.

In very measured and polite terms, he stated that my case did not amount to a gnat's bite of bugger all.:mad: but after a pause ....


















proceeded to demolish the Council's case!:D:D:D

He said that the Council's case appeared to be fundamentally in error in the the parking regulations did not apply in cases of double parking!:thumb2:thumb2

I won't go into the details but it appears that I may have stumbled upon a major loophole in the parking regulations here which is why his final words were ...

"I will deliver a judgement in writing but my preliminary finding is in your favour. However, I know the Council will be concerned at this and you should be prepared for a further appeal from them and a demand for a review of my judgement.":eek:

Whaddya know? I'm a cause celebre!!!! I only wish I could take the credit rather than Mr "Rumpole". Top bloke!:clap:clap:clap:clap:clap:clap:clap:clap:clap
 
went to Kendal last year parked up in a car park in town , some Muppet had parked in the 1st mc.parkin bay so the other was fullish, there was just enough room for me n a mate.
i was just in the chevron area... not blockin any cars or access.

we came back.. n both ov us had a ticket...
i threw it..
where's the proof its was on the bike wen i got back to it, (folk have taken em before)

a month or so after i got a ticket reminder in the post...askin for £60 to pay.

i wrote back n said what ticket, there wasnt one on me bike wen i got back to it:Augie

a week later another letter arrived and said they would reduce my fine back to £30 because there was a chance that my ticket could of been stolen, also there was a feking great photo copy of the camera image , clearly showing the ticket on my clocks....:blast

no argument there.....but my mate who was in the same spot who was also illegally parked according to my ticket....didnt get a ticket:spitfire

i could of argued this fact but why drop ye mate in it too, :blast

so the fine was paid at the very last point just to piss em off...paperwork at last minute na all.

so with photographic evidence its makes a hard case to argue against...:spitfire take note of any area yer parked in , in the future....:augie

ugg.
 
Well done (so far) :thumb2

I can see the council investing in trying to get it overturned though.

cnuts!

Al:D
 
Today was the day. Got me best suit on and walked into the West Port clutching copies of the evidence for my appeal. I sent in the originals weeks ago and the actual hearing had been delayed on a couple of occasions. Once by me and once by "them".

Shown up to a pretty sparsely furnished office by a PA and there's a guy sitting in a pin stripe suit that just shouted "LAWYER". He introduced himself and we shook hands. All very amicable and casual.

"Rumpole" then explained his part in the proceedings and invited me to put my case, which I did.

His nibs listened politely to my bulsh ... sorry ... submission, making notes which amounted to a 1/2 page of A4. He then pushed back from the desk and lifted his own copy of the case file which included my own stuff and the Council's stuff. Coloured markers were all through it and I could see that sections had been highlighted. He had obviously done his homework and proceeded to tell me so.

In very measured and polite terms, he stated that my case did not amount to a gnat's bite of bugger all.:mad: but after a pause ...














proceeded to demolish the Council's case!:D:D:D

He said that the Council's case appeared to be fundamentally in error in the the parking regulations did not apply in cases of double parking!:thumb2:thumb2

I won't go into the details but it appears that I may have stumbled upon a major loophole in the parking regulations here which is why his final words were ...

"I will deliver a judgement in writing but my preliminary finding is in your favour. However, I know the Council will be concerned at this and you should be prepared for a further appeal from them and a demand for a review of my judgement.":eek:

Whaddya know? I'm a cause celebre!!!! I only wish I could take the credit rather than Mr "Rumpole". Top bloke!:clap:clap:clap:clap:clap:clap:clap:clap:clap

Result
sound good on yer:D
 
Well done ye jammy get :D

You were quite lucky then... a) not to go skiteing on yer erse and b) get off wi the ticket ( I remember you telling me about it in Skye).

So you'll be havin a wee swallae to celebrate :beer::beer: :beerjug:
 
If anyone in Southern Scotland had a bigger grin than me yesterday pm then I'd like to meet them!

What amazed me was the fact that the lawyer was effectively acting on my behalf, picking holes in the Council case and apparently having great fun doing it!

We'll see what the future brings but I reckon that meeting alone and the grin that resulted was worth the 60 squid on its own!
 
Well done ye jammy get :D

You were quite lucky then... a) not to go skiteing on yer erse and b) get off wi the ticket ( I remember you telling me about it in Skye).

So you'll be havin a wee swallae to celebrate :beer::beer: :beerjug:

not as jammy as me pogg,i was the one wi ugg who never got a ticket:stupid
 
The case continues ...

Got a letter this morning ...

The appeal was held on 21 July. I was notified of this did not appear since City of Edinburgh had indicated that they did not intend to hound me for the cash.

The gist of the letter (tried to upload it but it was too large for the site to handle) is that the Council asked for more time to research various aspects of the case and so it's been adjourned.

Sheesh, it was two years ago! How much time do they need.

If anyone's particularly interested, I'll email the letter if you PM me.

This could go on and on and on ...
 
Got a letter this morning ...

The appeal was held on 21 July. I was notified of this did not appear since City of Edinburgh had indicated that they did not intend to hound me for the cash.

The gist of the letter (tried to upload it but it was too large for the site to handle) is that the Council asked for more time to research various aspects of the case and so it's been adjourned.

Sheesh, it was two years ago! How much time do they need.

If anyone's particularly interested, I'll email the letter if you PM me.

This could go on and on and on ...

If it goes on and on, and they win their appeal, I hope they don't ask for costs :augie
 
I have a mate who works in the payment office of the Council parking Attendents. He ays to contest every ticket. When you contest it the cost remains the same and you will still get the 14 days to pay the cheaper amount.

The Edinburgh aprking lot have so many tickets contested that they write off masses, so go for it. Ask to see a copy of the regulations, the photos of the bike with the ticket displayed.

Any damage to the bike as a result of the afixing of the ticket? Mention that as well.

Good luck
 


Back
Top Bottom