CRITICAL FACTS about riding kit for Tossers

oldrascal

Registered user
Joined
Nov 4, 2008
Messages
1,523
Reaction score
0
Location
Chichester
I would not expect novices to be haunting this forum lusting after a R1200GSA :P but even some of the more experienced riders could benefit from this piece written by an American journalist. Although he was specifically referring to his Rukka kit, the general principal applies:



"I was testing the Rukka Air Power jacket and pants on a rainy August day, but only to see how waterproof they were. As I rode my 1997 Harley-Davidson Road King home, about 6:00 o´clock in the evening, I did not give much thought as to why I was wearing the Rukka riding suit, expect that both the jacket and pants were proving to be exceptionally waterproof.
Traveling along Maryland´s interstate 795 at 65 mph is usually an uneventful ride, but as I exited the interstate the front tire made contact with a metal expansion joint. Usually these links run straight across roadway and bridges so that the front tire hits them at a perpendicular angle -no problem. However this metal joint runs the right up the center of the exit lane and is about 80 feet long.
As I said, it had been raining and we all know what happens when damp metal meets damp rudder. The front tire started sliding immediately along the hunk of metal, twisting the handlebars to the right. Before I could straighten the bars, the tire rolled off the metal joint and back on to the pavement. Traction was regained instantly, as was the lock-to-lock tankslapper that followed. The frictional force wrenched the bars from my hands and I broke the left mirror trying to grasp the flailing bars. My motorcycle and I were parted and both of us started our long slide down the interstate.
I was thrown off the side of the bike and landed squarely on both knees. Bouncing along the highway, I ended up in a " sitting" position with my hands extended behind me. As I slid down the road, probably doing about 55 mph, I had a great view of the various cars franticly trying to avoid running into the motorcycle and myself. I was trying to figure out which way I might have to roll to keep from becoming road kill, but the cars seemed to be slowing at the same rate of speed that I was. I probably slid over 100 feet.
Thanks to some dumb luck ( I didn´t get run over by a 3000 pound car) and good "risk management" ( I was wearing protective gear), I was shaken, but not injured. Had I been attired in what we at CycleShark see many motorcyclists wearing ( helmet, T-shirt, gloves, shorts and tennis shoes) this story would have a different ending. Images of a walking human scab come to mind, along with other more serious trauma. Without a doubt, the Rukka, Air Power jacket and pants were responsible in preventing injuries in this crash.
However, in doing its job, the riding suit was seriously damaged. The riding pants have C.E. approved (meets European Personal Protective Equipment laws) armor in the knees and hips. This armor is made from flexible rubber with a "waffle" pattern that allows air to pass through it. The impact on the knee areas was so severe that the armor started to come through the Cordura patch on both knees, but stayed in place providing excellent protection. I know this because my kneecaps were not shattered.
The same was true of the left hip area. Had there been no armor, and only Cordura, bruised or broken bones could have resulted. The seat area had an 8-inch hole worn through it from the slide. Again there was no injury to my posterior. The jacket, which uses the same armor, sustained damage to both elbows as the Cordura was ripped apart, exposing the armor underneath. The armor stayed where it was supposed to, again, preventing bone-grinding injuries to both of my elbows.
The air Power two-piece riding suit costs what the ambulance ride to the hospital would have been - about $850. Hardly a large amount when you factor in the huge surgical bills that would have been generated if I were clad in street wear. I was back to work the next day, complaining and cranky, but otherwise OK.
If you´re a rider that does not currently own good protective ridin gear consider this. Next time you are driving your car at 70 mph, imagine opening the door and jumping out on to the "belt sander" that is road asphalt at speed. When you switch your car for your favorite motorcycle, but ride in street clothing-well, you get the picture. As David Hough, one of our contributors says, "when your turn comes up, you´ll be slidingdown the road in whatever gear you decided to wear before you punched the started button."

It can be a right Royal pain to kit up and we sometimes 'take a chance' on a lovely warm day with leaving out a layer or two - but this is a big mistake. The highly graphic and very lucid example of an accident unravelling above is the clearest example I have ever seen of just how easily a joyful trip can turn into a nightmare. Luckily he was well protected and had his wits about him - and even more luckily he 'low-sided' because a 'high-side' is a whole different ball game. :eek:

Now don't be put off by this account because worse happens in the home and more people get hurt falling off ladders than bikes. But don't be fobbed off with cheap and flash kit either because there is no cheap option when it comes to buying protective clothing.

So my advice to all is to buy the very best that you can afford - your skin and bones will thank you. :comfort


Note to Moderators: I was not sure where to post this but the account is just so good and informative that I felt here was the right place. Please feel free to move it elsewhere if you think it more relevant.
 
Ya can't beat good old patronising bollox for the weekend.:thumb2

Wear what you want, when you want.
 
Ya can't beat good old patronising bollox for the weekend.:thumb2

Wear what you want, when you want.

.......and a big thumbs up to that AdamA .:thumb

But there is nothing like having an informed opinion before deciding to cast caution to the wind. You may well be an experienced, bugs-in-teeth, hairy-assed hell raiser :rob who likes what he likes and does as he damn well pleases and good on yer, I say. There is too much health and safety facism in society today :ronno (note the local council Elf & Safety fascists who have banned swimming lengthwise in the local pool because the lifeguards might put be putting their own lives in danger in the event of a rescue :nenau).

But the clue as to why I posted this might be found in the section title....."If you're new here"......because there is nothing like knowledge to allow an informed judgement and new riders can be overwhelmed by how much there is to take in with the biker lifestyle.

But you are absolutely right, to each their own and hang the consequences. :D
 
I have a serious allergy to pain and a fatal allergy to death.
I enjoyed reading it, just to re-emphasize how fragile we really are, i'm sure my family would rather me spend a few more quid on a decent bit of kit than waste their time and money visiting me either in hospital or at the cemetry!!

This is my opinion and not necessarily that of any other users of this site :augie
 
I have a serious allergy to pain and a fatal allergy to death.
I enjoyed reading it, just to re-emphasize how fragile we really are, i'm sure my family would rather me spend a few more quid on a decent bit of kit than waste their time and money visiting me either in hospital or at the cemetry!!

This is my opinion and not necessarily that of any other users of this site :augie

Likewise.
This is nothing to do with health and safety as some say - more self preservation and common sense.
'Wear what you want, sod the consequences' brigade are welcome to their view.
But then so are the views of the 'I don't like pain/injuries/broken bones/shredded skin/upset relatives' brigade :thumb2
 
Likewise.
This is nothing to do with health and safety as some say - more self preservation and common sense.
'Wear what you want, sod the consequences' brigade are welcome to their view.
But then so are the views of the 'I don't like pain/injuries/broken bones/shredded skin/upset relatives' brigade :thumb2

What about the views of the 'Fine, it's your right to wear anything you like mate, but don't come whining to me or expect your hospital bills for totally avoidable injuries to come out of my tax money you selfish barsteward' brigade? :augie

I'm all for supporting people's rights, but too often, people forget that with rights come responsibility :(
 
When I was in Oz a few months back they were running a few gruesome campaigns to encourage better use of protective clothing. Some of the ads are here

http://www.spokes.com.au/#/rider-safety

Click on the computer monitor on the screen.

After watching these you will always reach for the riding suit...

In Oz they seem to take the information approach rather than the blitz everything with cameras and hope for the best (although cameras are still a fact of life - they are hidden and mobile, not stuck on a pole and painted bright colours).

The videos are not for those of a gentle disposition.
 
Safety Videos

Excellent. These should be screened in the UK, preferably Friday evening before the Saturday morning lunacy. :eek The clearest illustration that jeans etc.:cool are as much use as fag paper, :eek:and not only skin but subcutaneous fatty tissue, musculature, tendons and bones all go down the meat ginder that is the highway, and that's not at 'translight' speeds either.:eek::eek::eek:

The kit might be a bit warm in summer (???) but by heck, at least you stand a chance to walk away...:)

Mike
 
We had a bike cop come in to school when I was about 14 (?) to give a talk....nice guy he was, made a very good impression and he showed us his riding jacket that had burnt/rubbed through, and then the scar on his side from the same incident that had been caused by the heat alone....after being asked to imagine what it woould have looked like without the jacket, it's something I've always remembered.

That's the time to do the education thing I reckon.....not in any preachy way, but as a common sense 'it's up to you but be aware of the consequences ' way.......when people are 17 or a bit older, it tends to hit against their already formed opinions and feelings of immortality /peer pressure from the Spanish riding core in their peergroup etc.
 
the clue as to why I posted this might be found in the section title....."If you're new here"......because there is nothing like knowledge to allow an informed judgement and new riders can be overwhelmed by how much there is to take in with the biker lifestyle.
Being new here doesn't mean you are new to bikes. Being new to bikes doesn't mean you can't see that protective gear could be a good idea.


The clue as to why I find it patronising can be found in:
even some of the more experienced riders could benefit from this piece written by an American journalist...

I'm fairly certain that even the newest riders on here are not so inexperienced or indeed stupid enough to not realise that sliding on your (effectively) bare arse at 65mph down the tarmac is going to hurt.
The more experienced ones certainly don't need telling. They choose not to wear ATGATT, knowing, accepting and hopefully mitigating the risks. Do you really think many people just don't realise the risk? :nenau
(You don't get many 17 year old scooter boys that can't think for themselves on here. ;))

I used to be strictly ATGATT for years. But of late I have realised it's perfectly possible to ride in a manner that means there is very little risk of grave injury with minimal protective gear. You just have to ride accordingly.
I'm now in the WWYWWYW camp.
Either way I wouldn't tell others what they should wear. It would be somewhat patronising to think my opinion was more important than theirs.
 
When training things out at work I always aim for the slowest learner so to speak. So perhaps it is good to appear patronising to some. Out of all who read it there may be just one person who initially thought falling off at less than 30 with jeans on would cause no real damage, realises they were wrong and it can. They then adjust either thier attire or riding style then i think its worth it....

Again, we all have different views on things and thats what makes for interesting debates......:D
 
Last edited:
When training things out at work I always aim for the slowest learner so to speak. So perhaps it is good to appear patronising to some. Out of all who read it there may be just one person who initially thought falling off at less than 30 with jeans on would cause no real damage, realises they were wrong and it can. They then adjust either thier attire or riding style then i think its worth it....
You think people REALLY think falling off a bike won't hurt?:confused:
And if these people do exist you think those people will REALLY change their minds after reading this? :nenau

Again, we all have different views on things and thats what makes for interesting debates......:D
For sure. I'm not saying my opinion is right and others are wrong, just saying what my opinion is. I know that's not advised by some in these parts when your opinion differs tho. :oonyack
 
Being new here doesn't mean you are new to bikes. Being new to bikes doesn't mean you can't see that protective gear could be a good idea.


The clue as to why I find it patronising can be found in:


I'm fairly certain that even the newest riders on here are not so inexperienced or indeed stupid enough to not realise that sliding on your (effectively) bare arse at 65mph down the tarmac is going to hurt.
The more experienced ones certainly don't need telling. They choose not to wear ATGATT, knowing, accepting and hopefully mitigating the risks. Do you really think many people just don't realise the risk? :nenau
(You don't get many 17 year old scooter boys that can't think for themselves on here. ;))

I used to be strictly ATGATT for years. But of late I have realised it's perfectly possible to ride in a manner that means there is very little risk of grave injury with minimal protective gear. You just have to ride accordingly.
I'm now in the WWYWWYW camp.
Either way I wouldn't tell others what they should wear. It would be somewhat patronising to think my opinion was more important than theirs.


The whole point of posting this article (which I came across by chance when looking for a review of a Rukka suit) was not to bring any new revelation to the obvious fact about getting hurt if you are not properly protected when having a tumble. But it is the first time that I have seen such a lucidly written account of the sequence of events and subsequent analysis of a rider coming off his bike.

Personally, I am only too aware of my own mortality and the effect that my wish to 'ride free' might have on my wife and children if the worst happens. So I always ride fully kitted and protected as best as I can. Reading this, it just brings these thoughts even more clearly into focus.

The article was just so vivid, clear, graphic and understandable that I wanted to share it. The pen is not going to stop you doing what want, but might, just might, bring realisation and clarity to those that care to be affected by the words and images.
 
You think people REALLY think falling off a bike won't hurt?:confused:
And if these people do exist you think those people will REALLY change their minds after reading this? :nenau

No, i didnt say that people think it wont hurt, i said it "would cause no real damage" as some think jeans are pretty robust. Well, it made me think again about what i wear when on the bike, in the hot week we had I rode my bike with ordinary jeans, fleece type jacket and trainers. Reading that and also watching the clips reminded me that accidents can happen and would i rather the pain, or, perhaps sweat a bit from protective clothing...i'd choose clothing.

I think we'll agree to slightly disagree :beerjug:
 
You think people REALLY think falling off a bike won't hurt?:confused:
And if these people do exist you think those people will REALLY change their minds after reading this? :nenau

I don't think anyone thinks that it won't hurt Adam, but unless you've seen it first hand or have experienced it, it's easy to mentally minimise the risks .....after you've pictured the road as a 70mph sanding strip (as per article) it may make someone think twice, or at the very least be more aware of how bad it would actually be.

It's about being able to make informed decisions....you have, but others may not be able to unless they've considered it properly and appreciate the consequences.

It's all a question of balance and common sense........some people lack either :(
 
I've been down the road on my arse enough times, so by choice I always wear leathers...

Bloke down my street with a GS, rides in shorts, then collects his daughter from school on the pillion, in her everyday clothes. Now one day, that's gonna hurt...
 
I found the recent hot spell really uncomfortable and elected to go for a ride wearing a pair of cotton cargo pants rather then my usual leather jeans or kevlar lined cargo pants, only very slightly cooler when on the move, but at traffic speeds or at a stop, jeez the heat coming off the motor meant that I was actually hotter, thankfully the weather gods have elected that for most of my summer riding this year I will be mostly wearing armoured waterproofs. in my youth I once got off at speed wearing what was at the time the de rigeur outfit of leather jacket levis, bike boots, gloves and my trusty Bell Star, I got to look at my kneecap first hand, I dont need another look :thumb2

Stewart
 
It's all a question of balance and common sense........some people lack either :(

In which case will a pretty gash article someone found on the internet really make those people think again? :blast

Now if you want something that might just have the impact to get through to people, do a search for Brittany Morrow.
 


Back
Top Bottom