Hi all,
I'm looking at buying an early (04,05) R1200GS. I've had a trawl through the forums and have frightened myself with all the horror stories of what can go wrong! Equally I'm sure there are oodles of very happy GS owners!!
Can I ask please if there is anything specific I need to be looking out for with a 9 or 10 year old GS?
I've read mixed reports of the brakes on the early bikes - anyone got any opinions on those please?
I've had three 1200gs including a 2004 from new. Its true that they arent Honda quality but you will get totally the wrong impression from reading the forums which inevitably are reports of issues. After all. most riders who dont have a problem are out riding rather than posting.
So what to look out for on a 2004/5
1/ BMWs corrode but then so do all bikes. The worst bits are the painted aluminium of things like the engine front cover but given that you are looking at a 10 year old bike you cant expect it to be corrosion free. Just be prepared to repaint bits
2/ Early bikes had servo br4akes which I thought were brilliant. However, if neglected ( so check brake fluid changes every 2 years) they can fail. Contrary to the tripe sometimes written on here, the brakes still work. Just without servo and therefore a much harder pull.
3/ early bikes sometimes had oil leaks between the engine and the gearbox. Check this area
4/ Bevel boxes - applies to all 1200 in RT etc up to the intro of the toilet. The bevel box is a weak design and the bearings can fail. Repair is about £400 if you diy the strip and assembly.
5/ Fuel pump issues due to collection of rain in the electrics.
My 2004 was 100% reliable for the two years I had it. The next bike had the bevel box issue. Current bike no problems yet.
My7 attitude is that the good parts about the bike outweigh the reliability issues. Better a less than perfect GS than a perfectly boring Honda.