Unless there a dedicated booths for those with chipped passports and who have completed the app, I don’t think it will save much time. You’ll still be queued behind all those who haven’t.
All it might save you is the questions you are asked on arrival at the booth. The questions in the app near enough match the questions I was asked on my two arrivals in Stockholm.
Your passport will (for now at least) still need to be stamped.
The Irish passport questions surprise me. I never use my British passport to go to the EU, and as I don’t go anywhere else any more, I wonder why I bought it. The Irish one does all I need, so far…I have travelled to Sweden on a monthly basis for the last two years. Even when using my Irish passport I get questioned on reason for trip, date of return flight etc.
When using my British passport it steps up more, even being asked about stamps for other countries on my passport.
Barry
Isn't that the point of the new system?One difference, though it might be an oversight by the immigration officer at Arlanda airport, Stockholm is that there seems to be no entry stamp in my passport.
Except that facial recognition is certainly not foolproof, there’ve been quite a few cases of plod pulling the wrong person based on their facial recognition trawls.The app makes no appreciable difference to one’s entry to Sweden, one of the only two counties that have sanctioned its use.
Questions at the passport booth on the length of stay, purpose of visit and where one is staying, along with another look in the camera. No finger prints this time as mine had been taken before, so I assume they are held somewhere.
The camera’s purpose seems to be to match one’s digital face to the image in the passport. I can only assume it does it better than a human is able to? The days of the manned teahuts will soon be over, replaced by AI. That’s one positive step of progress, I guess.
Isn't that the point of the new system?
Except that facial recognition is certainly not foolproof, there’ve been quite a few cases of plod pulling the wrong person based on their facial recognition trawls.
It depends on your view of Ai in general. No doubt it has some benefits but the massive over- expectation of it, largely from politicians and business leaders that think Claude is likely to be a jolly French chap in a stripy jumper, is staggering.No doubt. Though if the number of correct identities is greater than the number of false, it is an overall improvement, is it not?
More importantly, if the number of times the AI can identify a suspected falsehood (or in the case of the police, say a wanted criminal) reliably (and quickly) exceeds those of a human, then - again - it’s a good thing, surely?
The app makes no appreciable difference to one’s entry to Sweden, one of the only two counties that have sanctioned its use.
Questions at the passport booth on the length of stay, purpose of visit and where one is staying, along with another look in the camera. No finger prints this time as mine had been taken before, so I assume they are held somewhere.
The camera’s purpose seems to be to match one’s digital face to the image in the passport. I can only assume it does it better than a human is able to? The days of the manned teahuts will soon be over, replaced by AI. That’s one positive step of progress, I guess.
filling in the app, did you get as far as getting the QR code?
I didn’t see a QR code appear in the app. The screen in the app with the little message that I was all set to enter Sweden appeared. What did I miss?
