GSA & Hilltop re-map

Phoenix_63

Member
UKGSer Subscriber
Joined
Sep 14, 2013
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Location
NW Kent
Hi,
Just a short(ish) tale from me. I bought my '08 GSA a few weeks ago from a good friend who upgraded to an LC. It came with the Akra can fitted but the standard headers which were showing a lot of discolouration. I was advised by several mates with the same bike to ditch the cat, and so the process began...cost was a problem then I sourced a set of brand new Akra headers from fleabay for £260!!! That prompted more thoughts regarding lean running and potential solutions. I didn't want a power commander(£500 plus programming / dyno costs) and felt the 'boosters' that fit onto the Lambda sensors weren't really a solution, then I found Hilltop's (here) who offer a re-map of the ECU to address these and other 'issues'. Soooo...my good mate and spot-on mechanic Mark at MH Motorcycles in Bromley (here) fitted the headers and serviced the bike prior to my trip to Leicester. The Akra headers immediately improved the bike but it was still, well, a boxer! A bit lumpy, particularly when rolling back on the power after de-celerating at lower speeds (about 3,000 RPM) but the bike was pulling better as well as sounding a lot quieter!

When I arrived at Hilltops I got chatting to Geoff (Geoff loves McVities Hobnobs by the way) and his sidekick 'Ant' who doesn't do biscuits. (B0ll0cks doesn't he!!!) and what an interesting bunch of people! I could chat to Geoff and listen all day to his experiences and life story but I had gone to get a job done so he cracked on.

To those who don't know, or are considering this, what they do is run your bike up 'as is' on the dyno. Mine showed about 83 BHP at the rear wheel (not bad, I thought) and the Torque figure was about 58 ft/lb (when I was expecting 62 or so, but never mind). It also showed a huge drop at about 3000 RPM and really lean running which was my main area of concern, having suffered burnt valves in the past on another bike.

Next they install Geoff's own 'software' which is just time for more biccies, tea and much wagging of chins. Another dyno run follows during which Geoff fine-tunes the software for the small differences that all bikes have before a final run. Explanations are given, if you want to know more, and you can observe the process if you wish.

My final figures were an increase to 103 BHP (+25%) peak and a maximum torque of about 85 ft/lb!!! Now, I'm not likely to see / use peak power but the torque produced is awesome. At about 2,500 RPM it produces more torque than the original map peaked at! At places in the curve it has almost triple the torque! The fuelling was also sorted to eliminate the lean running, all the curves are now much more even. I was absolutely stunned!

This 'software' is constantly monitoring atmospheric data throughout the rev-range rather than the old BMW map which does so below 3,000 RPM then defaults to a one size fits all setting. As a result the bike is now MUCH more responsive, almost like riding a multi-cylinder; it picks up THAT quick.

So, how does it ride? Well it really is difficult to explain but I'll try. From starting the engine the smoothness is immediately apparent in the lack of vibration. When moving off you don't need a bit of extra gas to 'catch' the take-up, it just does what a bike should do. I should say, before anyone accuses me of not being able to move off that I am familiar with the R1200 having ridden one (several, actually) operationally for many years so I know what they're like! Having got going the fluidity of the engine is incredible; no coughs, no splutters, no hesitation, just oodles of grunt. You get exactly what you ask for from the throttle, gentle acceleration or full-on grunt if that's what you need, with NO lag in performance. Economy doesn't seem to have been particularly affected; the on-board computer showed a reduction of just less than 1 MPG but I was keener to use the performance so in the grand scheme of things I don't see a problem, but I would happily sacrifice a few MPG's for the smoothness alone.

Apparently similar gains are achieved with standard exhausts and because this software monitors everything throughout the rev-range a subsequent change in exhausts will not generally need a further re-map so long as the Lambda sensors are retained

Those that have had this done will read this thread and say to themselves 'Yep, that's what it does' whereas those that haven't had it done should be picking up the 'phone and GETTING it done! It cost me £350-00 with UKGSer discount. It's the best money you will EVER spend. Compare that with £350-00 of 'independent german bling' and whether it actually improves the machine! I have absolutely no connection with Hilltops, this is just my honest evaluation of them.
 
Cheers, if the mods want to move / link then that's fine. Didn't really know where to put this as it is useful for all R1200's as well...
 
You won't regret it, Miff, it totally transforms the bike into what it should have been...save hard!!!!
 
A very comprehensive account which states the benefits of remapping well. Its just such a great pity that you obviously have not got the riding ability to cope with all the extra power and smoothness.
 
This 'software' is constantly monitoring atmospheric data throughout the rev-range rather than the old BMW map which does so below 3,000 RPM then defaults to a one size fits all setting.

Apparently similar gains are achieved with standard exhausts and because this software monitors everything throughout the rev-range a subsequent change in exhausts will not generally need a further re-map so long as the Lambda sensors are retained

I'd like to know how it's possible to do this without running wide-band lambda sensors..... :nenau
 
A very comprehensive account which states the benefits of remapping well. Its just such a great pity that you obviously have not got the riding ability to cope with all the extra power and smoothness.


Apologies Scott - that's what happens when you leave a certain Mr Brown alone with your laptop.
 
Oh how I miss my old workmates!!!

Schtum, I don't know how, or, why, it just does. You could try asking Geoff at Hilltop but it's his expertise you're paying for so I doubt he's about to give it away for free!
 
Hilltop

Have you got a ghost writer?

I've been to court with you and you've not written that much in your AI report:augie

Bill
 
I'd like to know how it's possible to do this without running wide-band lambda sensors..... :nenau

It looks like the fuel injection setup on the GS has an "adaptive table" that monitors via the o2 sensors if its rich or lean - on the gs-911 its something you can reset so it must "adapt" and learn from the o2 sensors when its allowed to, it may very well be allowed to adapt all the time rather than just when in closed loop but probably only for very small adjustments, but I am not sure.

This is not anything like what a wideband can do which works off of current (rather than o2's which work off of voltage values) and can tell the difference between very rich or very lean at any given time! But I am not sure if the o2s can take a value (rich/lean) at any given time/rpm/tps to work it out what the actual value is and how often it learns then writes this back to the adaptive table.

The bike will work in closed loop mode for anything up to about 50% of engine RPMs and also dependant upon the TPS angle which is often around 20% (once the engine is up to temp), then outwith this it will be in open loop and read from the ECU, however I am not sure if the adaptive table contents can still effect in open loop on the fuel injection system, would be interesting to know, especially if the adaptive table is still working rich/lean settings out over and above the map that's in the ECU. Would be nice if it did....
 


Back
Top Bottom