stephenth
Guest
I’d appreciate being able to tap into the experiences of people here to try and help me decide which GS to go for.
I’ve not had a GS (or BMW) before, but they do seem like my kind of bike. I appreciate their character and air of competence. I have ridden various BMW’s, and had a chat with a couple of people with GS’s.
I’m looking for a bike to -
• Keep for a fair length of time
• Maintain myself
• Use for day-to-day use, and touring – often two up, mostly non-motorway, some small roads and gravel tracks. Not much inner city stuff.
What is important to me in a bike –
• A reasonable / good level of reliability. I really don’t want to set off every time wondering what is going to break today, or have oil leaking all over the place.
• Real – world competence. Good handling on roads – usually sweeping A roads – rather than a racetrack. The power to overtake when needed. Two hour comfort from the seat and the ergonomics of the bike (I realise this is to some extent a personal thing). Reasonable fuel economy, coupled with a sensible tank range – 200 miles if possible.
• A non-frantic engine sound at sensible cruising speeds – say up to 85 mph.
• Ability to do the majority of servicing myself, coupled with commonsense engineering. I spanner my bikes myself for most things, and I get really annoyed by designers / engineers who have for instance buried spark plugs so deep in cylinder heads that you can’t see what gunge is waiting to fall in the cylinder when you remove the plug; or engine layout such that its almost impossible to properly adjust valve clearances. How easy to service / accessible / not requiring shed loads of specialised equipment is the bike? How well supported in terms of spares is the model?
• Character. No matter how competently the bike performs, I want it to make me feel good. A part of this is good build quality, including the ability to remain looking good without being polished every day.
What’s NOT important to me –
• The year of the registration plate.
• Playing top trumps with the numbers from the specifications.
• Shiny chrome (in fact, the less the better!).
• Image.
I’m thinking along the lines of an 1150 (but I don’t know which one – are there any years to go for / avoid?) at the moment. My logic for narrowing it down to this is –
• Older models – getting difficult to identify good examples now, and some concerns over spares availability into the future.
• 1200 – still too much of a depreciation hit on a bike I intend to keep, but more importantly, I have some concerns over build and finish quality, and the ability to home service these models.
But I really would appreciate your thoughts on this. Once you’ve given me your opinions, I’ll carefully collate them, produce a comparison chart, do what I want to do anyhow, and then spot something somewhere and make a spur of the moment decision which goes against all my planning. Just like everybody else!
Cheers.
I’ve not had a GS (or BMW) before, but they do seem like my kind of bike. I appreciate their character and air of competence. I have ridden various BMW’s, and had a chat with a couple of people with GS’s.
I’m looking for a bike to -
• Keep for a fair length of time
• Maintain myself
• Use for day-to-day use, and touring – often two up, mostly non-motorway, some small roads and gravel tracks. Not much inner city stuff.
What is important to me in a bike –
• A reasonable / good level of reliability. I really don’t want to set off every time wondering what is going to break today, or have oil leaking all over the place.
• Real – world competence. Good handling on roads – usually sweeping A roads – rather than a racetrack. The power to overtake when needed. Two hour comfort from the seat and the ergonomics of the bike (I realise this is to some extent a personal thing). Reasonable fuel economy, coupled with a sensible tank range – 200 miles if possible.
• A non-frantic engine sound at sensible cruising speeds – say up to 85 mph.
• Ability to do the majority of servicing myself, coupled with commonsense engineering. I spanner my bikes myself for most things, and I get really annoyed by designers / engineers who have for instance buried spark plugs so deep in cylinder heads that you can’t see what gunge is waiting to fall in the cylinder when you remove the plug; or engine layout such that its almost impossible to properly adjust valve clearances. How easy to service / accessible / not requiring shed loads of specialised equipment is the bike? How well supported in terms of spares is the model?
• Character. No matter how competently the bike performs, I want it to make me feel good. A part of this is good build quality, including the ability to remain looking good without being polished every day.
What’s NOT important to me –
• The year of the registration plate.
• Playing top trumps with the numbers from the specifications.
• Shiny chrome (in fact, the less the better!).
• Image.
I’m thinking along the lines of an 1150 (but I don’t know which one – are there any years to go for / avoid?) at the moment. My logic for narrowing it down to this is –
• Older models – getting difficult to identify good examples now, and some concerns over spares availability into the future.
• 1200 – still too much of a depreciation hit on a bike I intend to keep, but more importantly, I have some concerns over build and finish quality, and the ability to home service these models.
But I really would appreciate your thoughts on this. Once you’ve given me your opinions, I’ll carefully collate them, produce a comparison chart, do what I want to do anyhow, and then spot something somewhere and make a spur of the moment decision which goes against all my planning. Just like everybody else!
Cheers.
