For those who are thinking about a Hilltop remap, you may want to consider my recent experience before you decide. Having read glowing reports on a number of bike forums and this one in particular, I had my 2014 Yamaha XT1200z “remapped” by Geoff in June this year, just before a three week tour of Germany and Austria. It was difficult to assess any improvement on the ride home from Hilltop because it was in a torrential downpour and the motorway ride to Folkestone didn't provide much opportunity either. However as the holiday wore on I struggled to notice any meaningful change in the bike.
When I got back home I phoned Geoff and explained my disappointment with the “remap”, so he agreed to reverse it and refund me the cost (after dire warnings about how lean it was running before the remap). Since “unmapping” the bike I have noticed no discernible difference in the bike.
With hindsight, I should have heeded the warning signs (but I kept thinking, “how could all these bikers be wrong?”):
Geoff was reluctant to explain exactly how he remapped bikes and didn't commit to anything in writing.
The workshop was an untidy mess and didn't look like a professional tuning establishment.
During the three hours spent at Hilltop in June, Geoff probably spent around 30 – 40 minutes actually doing anything to the bike (he arrived late and spent ages chatting to other visitors or on the phone, visiting the MOT part of the garage next door etc.)
Geoff did just three WOT dyno runs (no part throttle runs).
He connected his dyno to the diagnostic plug under the bike seat (other tuners who can truly reflash the XT1200z say that they have to plug directly into the ECU sockets to read and edit the various flashed maps).
I received no invoice describing the service he had provided (and certainly no VAT invoice, despite Geoff's website stating that he is a VAT registered business).
I did however receive the rather optimistic before and after dyno prints from the three dyno runs.
The “unmapping” at Hilltop in July took two hours during which Geoff again did anything but work on the bike – he spent perhaps 20 minutes max actually doing anything with it. At no time did he ask whether he could adjust the mapping to address what I felt were the deficiencies in the remap. Just before processing the refund Geoff again tried scare mongering about how lean it was now running, with dire warnings about it burning valves, holing pistons etc etc. He even showed me a new version of my dyno charts adding an A/F graph which showed off-the-scale 22:1 all the way up to 4500rpm (which was odd because I don't think that a petrol internal combustion engine can run under load at over 22:1 and will seriously misfire at 16:1). I was then asked to state my acceptance, in front of the cctv cameras, that Hilltop accepted no responsibility if the bike went bang. I was also informed that there would be no record of my bike having been “remapped” at Hilltop. Geoff was then happy to let me ride off on the bike…
Recent discussions on this forum indicate that nobody is sure what Geoff actually does to remap a bike or how he achieves such substantial power increases. Other tuners who are able to reflash an XT1200z have said that all that can be done via the diagnostic plug is load a serial eprom image into the spare memory, which then acts like a minimal functionality Powercommander inside the ECU. It is then possible to overlay a crude shadow fuel map which will have very few fuelling points (say, every 1500rpm instead of every 200rpm in the original flash) because of the limited spare memory in the ECU. The ECU then interpolates between the multiple original flashed maps (which remain unchanged, of course) and the overlaid shadow fuel map.
The success of this will depend on how well the particular bike's ECU manages to interpolate and factor in the data from the various existing flashed fuel and ignition maps and those relating to the many sensors (throttle position, crank position, temperature, manifold air pressure, lambda etc.). It has the potential to richen the A/F ratio, but this will be by inconsistent amounts depending on how the ECU processes data received from the base maps and other sensors in order to calculate fuel injection pulse duration.
This is not really ECU remapping, but it is cheap, quick and easy to do (no remapping software licences required and no need to gain access to the ECU, just the fairly common diagnostic plugs). There is of course no risk of a manufacturer's software map update overwriting the shadow fuel map because it is in the spare memory outside the true ECU flashed maps. Similarly, dealers' diagnostic software won't identify anything because the original flashed maps have not been amended in any way (and the flash counter doesn't change, of course).
The complexity of modern ECUs means that remapping takes around six hours and should involve 30 – 50 dyno runs, although feedback from other Hilltop customers on this forum indicates that whatever Geoff does works well on BMWs. Perhaps whatever he does is just ineffective on the latest XT1200z.