KTM 1190 Road test

GS TRV

Registered user
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
7,986
Reaction score
92
Location
Belfast
With some enthusiasm as to having my first run on the new 1190 KTM I was briefed on the modes/settings and let loose.

Well just like DavyF the firstt thing you notice about this bad boy is the engine - it it truly awesome :eek: If I had been blindfolded and asked what I was riding my old S1000RR with straight bars wouldnt have been too far from the sensations I was experiencing :eek::eek:

It just keeps accelerating and immediately i eased into hooligan mode. Incidentally I kept in Sport mode most of the time as the other modes seemed way too dull :D

I had about a 100mile ride on various types of roads.

Heres a quick summary;

+Engine - totally brilliant
+brakes - super powerful and superbike esque in power and feel
+ instrumentation - clear and detailed but still easy too navigate around
+ Handling - light and flickable
+ quality switchgear



- Suspension - felt it was a bit under damped and didnt absorb bumps as well as i expected
- Fork dive - majorly pissed me off as probably owing to strong brakes the forks seemed to disappear at the meerest handful which was quite disconserting
- riding position - bars seemed quite narrow and I was more crouched forward than I expected to be.
- pegs seemed quite narrow too. This coupled with a sit on top as opposed to sit in feeling left me feeling pretty exposed to the elements bizarrely and that combined with a screen which left me exposed to the wind blast from mid chest upwards (we're not all short arses like DavyF :D) made me think that if i was buying this bike i'd be changing the screen immediately.

As I recently demo'd an LC I have a fair idea of which appeals to various parts of my character. The LC still retains that feeling of touring two up capabilities and that combined with paralever/telelever make for a more pronounced feeling of wanting to tour the world. The KTM appealed to my hooligan nature and especially would make me want to have it for a Sun afternoon hoon bike. Its no coincidence that I ended up ciruclating the Ulster Grand Prix course for multiple laps after abanbandoning my back lane pootle.

There you go - KTM for manic hooligan stuff.
LC for longer distance and two up with a bit of hooning thrown in for good measure. LC would get my vote as its less of a one trick pony but in an ideal world I would have both as I like the funky KTM accessory catalogue :blast

Both great bikes in their own righ of course but versatility always scores higher in my book :thumb

Trev
 
That's some house you have there - Trev :eek:

That's one thing you get used to with the GS - the paralever suspension and stable wheelbase under braking..........

Did you have the suspension firmed up all the way?

Cheers

Al :thumb
 
That's some house you have there - Trev :eek:

That's one thing you get used to with the GS - the paralever suspension and stable wheelbase under braking..........

Did you have the suspension firmed up all the way?

Cheers

Al :thumb

Al - if only it was my pad :blast

I had the suspension in sport mode too (the bike had all the electronic gizmos on it) and felt sport was the best mode all round. The Comfort/Street setting made it even worse :(
 
There you go - KTM for manic hooligan stuff.
LC for the old farts who have lost their youthful exuberance.

Trev

Fixed...........:aidan

I hope you noticed that it was reasonably clean ? I'll take credit for that. :aidan

Is 5' 11" considered being a short-arse these days, you lanky freak ?!! :toungincheek Have to say, the riding position suited me perfectly with much less wind blast/turbulence than the slightly water cooled ditch pump and the slightly lent forward stance also kept the back pain that sets in on me after a while away. But sure, we're all different and that's what makes trying out all this stuff great. :)
 
That's weird as I didn't notice any fork dive when I tested one a while back.

And I'm surprised you said you would rather the LC for 2 up as that's the one area where it has been heavily criticised.

The 1190 does look a bit bland though-much prefer the R
 
That's weird as I didn't notice any fork dive when I tested one a while back.
R

I too find the fork dive comment odd as jumping from my 990 to the 1190 highlighted the lack of dive.

Can't believe you think the switchgear is quality tho, the indicator switch is hateful and makes the LC one look good!

Otherwise :D spot on and a good conclusion :D

Stu
 
I was a Philip McCallen, what a great shop and nice staff.
I took out
Ninja 300
KTM Adventure
Kawa Versys 1000.
All were great the KTM is a well built motorcycle everything works sweetly.
its light which is the good and fast but i am not really bothered about that. Did anyone notice a lack of chugability? 4th gear low speed it felt like it was running out of fuel. i only took it for a small spin its a great bike and does it all.
The Versys was a genuinely nice motorcycle and i could happily ride that bike all day.
 
That's weird as I didn't notice any fork dive when I tested one a while back.

And I'm surprised you said you would rather the LC for 2 up as that's the one area where it has been heavily criticised.

The 1190 does look a bit bland though-much prefer the R

I've always felt that was one of the BMW's strengths - the fact that the geometry of the bike changes little with load and braking.

I'm seriously tempted by the KTM, but will give both a test later this year- and check for any horror stories on each - next year when it is time to change :thumb2

Al
 


Back
Top Bottom