GSA comparison with GTL
OK - maybe time for me to reflect on the two bikes.
This is mainly on the basis of 2 up touring.
My 2008 fully loaded (in both senses
)GSA was a great bike. Over 4 years of ownership our touring 'rig' evolved to be the 3 panniers plus big tank bag plus pannier top bag. This allowed us to tour comfortably and I have posted quite a few very enjoyable trip reports on here.
The GSA felt loaded (although it never complained

). At 5'8'' the GSA is always a challenge but when you put the ESA into 2 person plus luggage mode it does have a really jacked up feel (I needed to remember to change the setting if I ever did anything solo - petrol stations being a good example

).
We only fell off once which was my fault on an extreme off camber junction. Fortunately Mrs C's leg protected the pannier
Performance was sufficient, more throttle required to get the load moving. I did suffer from throttle hand numbness, particularly on long motorway runs.
Protection was excellent
Fuel range was a real plus with the 330 mile range.
Comfort for me was never a problem. Mrs C did complain on some long runs which did result in one very quiet ferry crossing going back home
So the GTL (again fully loaded):
I was in a 5 year finance deal on the GSA and had no real plans to change - but - I had an inquisitive test ride on the GT/GTL.
My first impression was awful. As some others have said 'I did not get it'.
It's a big beast and I think in truth I was initially overwhelmed. I think the turning point was getting the chance to open up the engine and then the tables are turned. Now I was coming back down from WOW
After a morning of riding solo I picked up Mrs C. The pillion position is palatial with a seating position allowing visibility over the rider, nice wide heated seat, fully padded backrest and big grab bars. The ice on the cake was the speaker system which does work allowing us to listen to tunes on the move.
Doing a deal which was a bike swap for a similar ongoing monthly payment made the swap happen
So how did the GTL do on tour?
Luggage-wise the panniers and top box are insufficient for our touring needs. You cannot get a tank bag for this bike as due to the sweep of the bars there is a risk the bag and kill switch could connect (H&S risk

).
I did explore fitting a rack on the top box but this is not recommended so our solution was to lash a bag (Lomo

) to the top box.
I can flat foot on both sides which for me is needed as the bike is a real weight. Getting back on a GSA it feels really nimble in comparison. I have stopped coming to a standstill using the rear brake and now use the linked front brake to ensure both feet are out (maybe I am also aware I have no crash bars fitted

).
The ESA does not have the same jacked up feel as on the GSA.
Performance is awesome. It does not recognise being fully loaded and in Dynamic mode around alpine bends you have as much power as you want to play with. Excellent fun
The lack of bar vibration is good and I did use the cruise control on long runs which does give the opportunity of a rest.
Fuel range is less but OK (250 miles) and I was getting 45 mpg so similar to the GSA.
Protection is good, but at higher speeds when you put the screen up you do get some back-draft, you get used to it. A good feature are the fairing vents which you can push out and direct air towards your torso. This does work really well
The bike is very comfortable. We came back to the ferry in one 9 hour 850km run and Mrs C was still talking to me on the ferry (should I get the GSA back

).
So - as I said to begin with this comparison is related to 2 up touring, and in summary the change has been a positive move for us
PS - I managed to save this blurb before the site went down for the last hour


