Both ...pleaseWhat do you want; fast road cover at night or on weekends, or a (very successful) PR exercise that reduces mortality in a vulnerable section ?

Probably more bigoted than cynical to be fair but hey this is UK GSers!Maybe I'm being too cynical... but how many BikeSafe 'customers' in London are non-white ? Just a thought... the same principle is prevalent elsewhere, why not here ?
I thought they did it as an attachment from their local traffic operational command unit.... but I know a lot of things have changed over the last 10 years or so. Met management never liked the idea of their officers have a "cushy little number", more treat them mean, keep them keen!Perhaps they do not have enough volunteer officers to carry on? They are all volunteers aren't they.
I don't know about the MET Bikesafe, but when I did mine in Cambridgeshire years ago the officers volunteered and did it in their own time.I thought they did it as an attachment from their local traffic operational command unit.... but I know a lot of things have changed over the last 10 years or so. Met management never liked the idea of their officers have a "cushy little number", more treat them mean, keep them keen!
Haha sounds familiarI convinced my then boss that as a significant proportion of his workforce used motorcycles for commuting and leisure that they should cover the cost of a Bikesafe course as a proactive H&S measure. It was a well crafted 728 and quoted sickness rates and recovery times as a cost saving measure, not to mention he could use it as 'evidence' to climb the greasy pole
Subsequently 20 odd of us went on a jolly from the Ace, lunch included.
I don't know about the MET Bikesafe, but when I did mine in Cambridgeshire years ago the officers volunteered and did it in their own time.