Oh well, almost a year on and the dreaded 50mph signs have now appeared on the B4011. They're still (mostly) covered up with black bin-liners so the limit's obviously not in force yet but it soon will be. I did take the time to object formally to the proposal but it was clear from the responses by the council to the objection points that this was going to happen just as sure as night follows day. "Our minds are made up, don't try to confuse us with the facts", is an expression that springs to mind.
Responses to two of the points I raised were particularly interesting, but for different reasons. The first was in response to my observation that compliance levels with a reduced limit would be low in the absence of additional enforcement. The council confessed that "we too had believed that this would be likely, but compliance levels with newly introduced 30mph limits in villages have proved that this is not the case". Comparing compliance levels with new 30mph limits in villages with those on an open-aspect road are a bit dissingenous in my view but, hey, this is the wacky world of Oxfordshire Road Safety...
The second was in response to my comments about invisible road markings, the many missing marker studs and the worn-out sections of road surface. In this case, the council's line was that "if there was any evidence that any of these issues had lead to crashes then our maintenance department would be charged with taking corrective action". Well, guess what? Soon afterwards - around May or June, I seem to remember - the numerous missing marker studs were replaced and the invisble road markings were repainted with nice new white, reflective, paint. Also, a couple of the most defective bits of road were patched up. Now, call me a cynic, but is it coincidence that all this long-overdue "maintenence" work was carried out immediately prior to posting the new speed limits? After all, we wouldn't want to muddy the waters by making other improvements that affect the safety of those travelling on the road in question at the same time as we reduce the speed limit, would we? It makes me wanna
Responses to two of the points I raised were particularly interesting, but for different reasons. The first was in response to my observation that compliance levels with a reduced limit would be low in the absence of additional enforcement. The council confessed that "we too had believed that this would be likely, but compliance levels with newly introduced 30mph limits in villages have proved that this is not the case". Comparing compliance levels with new 30mph limits in villages with those on an open-aspect road are a bit dissingenous in my view but, hey, this is the wacky world of Oxfordshire Road Safety...
The second was in response to my comments about invisible road markings, the many missing marker studs and the worn-out sections of road surface. In this case, the council's line was that "if there was any evidence that any of these issues had lead to crashes then our maintenance department would be charged with taking corrective action". Well, guess what? Soon afterwards - around May or June, I seem to remember - the numerous missing marker studs were replaced and the invisble road markings were repainted with nice new white, reflective, paint. Also, a couple of the most defective bits of road were patched up. Now, call me a cynic, but is it coincidence that all this long-overdue "maintenence" work was carried out immediately prior to posting the new speed limits? After all, we wouldn't want to muddy the waters by making other improvements that affect the safety of those travelling on the road in question at the same time as we reduce the speed limit, would we? It makes me wanna

Last edited:


