New 10W50 oil= better mpg?

zoltan

Well-known member
UKGSer Subscriber
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
17,559
Reaction score
4,208
Location
England
Had the 24000m service done and as per dealers advice they used fully synthetic 10W50 oil. MPG is better now by almost 10%. I was getting around 54/55 mpg , done 600 miles since the service and I am getting 60/61:nenau.
No change in riding style.
I know that engines get loosen up with time and oil consummation virtually disappears, but this is my first 1200 engined bike where the mpg got better.
 
Had the 24000m service done and as per dealers advice they used fully synthetic 10W50 oil. MPG is better now by almost 10%. I was getting around 54/55 mpg , done 600 miles since the service and I am getting 60/61:nenau.
No change in riding style.
I know that engines get loosen up with time and oil consummation virtually disappears, but this is my first 1200 engined bike where the mpg got better.

That'd be a bonus if mine did the same. My MPG has gradually improved over the last 2k. It's now got 5300 miles on and am getting around 50-53mpg.
 
possibly as much to do with it just having had a service than anything else.

How in the name of bloody hell are people getting 55+mpg? :eek

I'm doing well if I can get it over 43.....
 
How in the name of bloody hell are people getting 55+mpg? :eek

I'm doing well if I can get it over 43.....

+ 1

i can potter at 50mph all day in 6th and just manage to get 50mpg!
bugger knows how to get 55 - 60mpg
 
I have had 57 before but that was a long steady run. 50 isnt so difficult and my norm with commuting is 47, I can get it down to 43 or into the 30s especially when its getting near service time.
 
Had the 24000m service done and as per dealers advice they used fully synthetic 10W50 oil. MPG is better now by almost 10%. I was getting around 54/55 mpg , done 600 miles since the service and I am getting 60/61:nenau.
No change in riding style.
I know that engines get loosen up with time and oil consummation virtually disappears, but this is my first 1200 engined bike where the mpg got better.

Oil consummation? Are you dipping your cock in it?:kissy2
 
How in the name of bloody hell are people getting 55+mpg? :eek

I'm doing well if I can get it over 43.....

I've got the DOHC GSA and struggled to get above 42mpg and couldn't understand these getting 50+, but all of a sudden the MPG started to rise (no change in riding style), now can't get it below 49mpg no matter how hard I try. Just assumed it's the engine starting to bed in :nenau
Oh, I use super unleaded fuels, this may make a slight difference :nenau
 
FUEL

Im getting 230 miles to a tank 2008 1200gs with a accelerater module fitted and on a mixed ride can get 60 to the gallon according to the clock computer,thats mixed riding of abuse and traffic and cruising :augie:D:D:D
 
I've got the DOHC GSA and struggled to get above 42mpg and couldn't understand these getting 50+, but all of a sudden the MPG started to rise (no change in riding style), now can't get it below 49mpg no matter how hard I try. Just assumed it's the engine starting to bed in :nenau
Oh, I use super unleaded fuels, this may make a slight difference :nenau

Mine's a dohc which has 3500 on it. I think the last one wavered around 47 so hopefully this one will improve a bit. Normal fuel though - I'm not posh. :augie
 
Looking at the posts not everyone is saying whether they are refering to a gs or gsa. Is'nt the gsa lower geared? its heaver and has a lot bigger frontal area and more drag with those big boxes. JJH
 
I've had my GS for 9 months now (05 GS 18K on the clock) and to begin with I was getting roughly 180 miles from a tank. Since it's 18K service I'm now getting over 220 miles from a tank with no other discernible changes. Cheapest of cheap fuel and it's also carrying around my fat ass so i'm quite impressed.:thumb2
 
So... it's not just me. For a moment I thought it's something wrong with the bike:augie
 
Im getting 230 miles to a tank 2008 1200gs with a accelerater module fitted and on a mixed ride can get 60 to the gallon according to the clock computer,thats mixed riding of abuse and traffic and cruising :augie:D:D:D

I think your idea of abuse may be somewhat kinder than others :nenau

I managed low 50's on my Bikesafe rideout which was on mainly slower B-Roads and keeping to all the limits.

Find "normal" riding provides about 43-46 mpg regardless of if I am solo or two-up, on back roads or motorways and a private road test showed 100mph two-up with luggage drops it down to about 35 :mad:
 
Looking at the posts not everyone is saying whether they are refering to a gs or gsa. Is'nt the gsa lower geared? its heaver and has a lot bigger frontal area and more drag with those big boxes. JJH

Mine is a GSA and I got the 57 mpg 2 up and fully loaded with tail bag and jesse boxes so about as big and heavy as it gets. The GSA might have a bigger frontal area but it is probably also a smoother airflow because your legs and shoulders aren't in the airflow.
 
Like to know what mine will get this weekend whilst away.
will be two up and luggaged up. mostley A roads and motorway. in France too.

spike
 
Mine is a GSA and I got the 57 mpg 2 up and fully loaded with tail bag and jesse boxes so about as big and heavy as it gets. The GSA might have a bigger frontal area but it is probably also a smoother airflow because your legs and shoulders aren't in the airflow.

That's impressive, were you just sat at 55mph in 6th? :augie
 


Back
Top Bottom