New Camera Sites on A40/A48 Gloucester

exeter_lad

Registered user
Joined
Sep 30, 2003
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Location
Forest of Dean
Those of you using the newly refurbished A40/A48 out of Gloucester may have noticed like me that there is a new speed camera site, even though the original Yellow box put up was taken down again. It will be back.

There is also a new mobile camera site by the Severn Bore Pub.

For details, visit this link http://www.glossafetycameras.org.uk/

Happy New Year :beerjug:
 
SCAMera partnership

Those of you using the newly refurbished A40/A48 out of Gloucester may have noticed like me that there is a new speed camera site, even though the original Yellow box put up was taken down again. It will be back.

There is also a new mobile camera site by the Severn Bore Pub.

For details, visit this link http://www.glossafetycameras.org.uk/

Happy New Year :beerjug:



Just sent the fukcers this........................................



If you intend to convince motorists in general that you are seriously interested in reducing KSI and PCI incidents, instead of JUST raking in as much cash as you can in a short period of time (MY personal opinion, as less than 6% of accidents are DIRECTLY attributed to excess speed), Then MAY I suggest marking the rear reflective surface of the cameras with the posted speed limit at that location. I eagerly anticipate your reply, although I personally suspect I WONT get one...


You think they will reply or more likely put my name in their database at Swansea, stick a "OF POLICE INTEREST" stop on sight notice on my bike, and generally harrass me till im too old to drive, or even care!!!! :hide
 
Good luck with that reply. There are few groups who can spin and twist and dodge like the Scammerati. They are more full of shit than your local sewer rats.

One question that's always interesting is:

"Can you tell me what were the causes of the crashes that have "justified" this camera?"

That usually takes around a year to answer, with repeated e-mails to and fro.

They'll hide behind the discredited "30% of crashes are speed related" DSA fudge, then, when you ask again for the specific causes of the crashes at that particular site, they'll try a few more fudges.

Then you'll get "we don't hold that data". That's neat - so they don't know what the causes were, but they've decided a camera's the answer.

Then, when you keep asking you'll get fobbed around a few more people. You might - as I often have - try a Freedom of Information request. They'll try to dodge that one too, and tell you the information is already in the public domain (even though they still don't know where you could find it or what the causes are).

Eventually, you might be able to get the causation stats (as I did for the M4 cameras) after paying nearly £700 for the data because it was "onerous" for them to produce it under FoI.

Then, when you finally get the stats that clearly show the causes of the crashes were inattention, looked but did not see, distraction and carelessness - and that speed had nothing to do with it - they'll come back with "ah - but that was just the police officer's opinion who filled in the form".

And, as soon as there's any decrease in crashes anywhere near a camera, they'll be in the local press trumpeting their success. Of COURSE they'll be a reduction in crashes - try looking up "regression to the mean", a basic statistical phenomenon. But when crashes go up again - as they often do, year to year, you won't find the Scammerati offering any answers.

Fecking marvellous - they do what they like, they're unaccountable, unelected, pointless and complete one-trick ponies.

"The answer's a scamera - now, what was the question again?"
 
Just for interest, I've sent them this:

Hi, I'm interested in knowing the causes of the crashes that have justified the new A40 speed camera at Linton Farm. Would you be able to tell me?

Thanks.

I'll post the response when I get one.
 
The trouble is every accident is speed related regardless of the speed. if there is no speed the there would be no accident because everyone would be sat around on their bikes or sat in their cars going nowhere. unfortunately the report of speed does not always suggest a high velocity of speed but just the fact fact the speed was involved.

I am sure this is nowhere at the end of this ongoing discussion, just another statement to add to it.

Keep it safe, Keep it the right way up and lets blow up money making cameras, but keep the saftey ones.
 


Back
Top Bottom