r60/6 r80 ?

stavross

Active member
UKGSer Subscriber
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
Location
warrington cheshie
having had 2xr1100gs and 1xr1150gs im looking at buying a r 60/6 or a r80 or similar just not sure what to avoid or what to go for any suggestions. the more i look at the old bm`s the more i like.
 
Nothing too much to avoid really. The /6 are bullet proof really, ran from around 1974 to 1976 coming in a variety of engine sizes, the R80 came in from around 1977/78, replacing the R75/7. Will be a bit more poke to the 80, and importantly the brakes will be a step ahead. I've got a /6 and even with front discs (R90s) the front brake is more for decoration. That said, ride accordingly and it's great fun. I'd suggest you'd be happy with either, go with what takes your fancy.
 
the bike im looking at has done 64,000 miles so i would imagine it would have been done but thanks for the advice. is it a costly thing to have done.
 
just been told the bike im after hasn't had the heads done and the current owner uses lead replacement every other tank full. any suggestions :confused:
 
I know this is a how long is a piece of string type of question :D but what would be the right price for what seems to be a good clean well serviced 1974 original R60/6
 
That depends if you're buying or selling !

If you're selling, none of this lot will offer more than a tenner - if you're buying one of them, it would be a steal at anything under £1200 :D
 
R60/6 usually have serious pinking problems. There's a special base gasket available to lower compression.
 
R60/6 usually have serious pinking problems. There's a special base gasket available to lower compression.

Is that an issue with the /5's as well? Particularly the R75/5, since there's one being sold round here (with a 1974 5 speed gearbox that I presume is from a /6 - is a bitza best avoided?)

Thanks...
 
Is that an issue with the /5's as well? Particularly the R75/5, since there's one being sold round here (with a 1974 5 speed gearbox that I presume is from a /6 - is a bitza best avoided?)

Thanks...

The 5-speed gearbox is a "good thing" IMO, & if it's an early one ( without ribbed casing ) it won't even show. Personally, I'd like the 5-speed 'box. The 75/5's that I've owned & ridden always ran well, but they are getting old now, so the quality of maintenance over the years may have been excellent - or poor. As always, ask questions, look at any paperwork & make your mind up on condition.
 
The 5-speed gearbox is a "good thing" IMO, & if it's an early one ( without ribbed casing ) it won't even show. Personally, I'd like the 5-speed 'box. The 75/5's that I've owned & ridden always ran well, but they are getting old now, so the quality of maintenance over the years may have been excellent - or poor. As always, ask questions, look at any paperwork & make your mind up on condition.

Would you say that even if the 5-speed is a 1974 box? I've heard rumours (but not details) that the early (kickstart?) 5-speeds weren't all that reliable? The bike I'm kind of considering here claims to be fitted with a '74 box and come with another '74 box as a spare.
 
To be clear, you are thinking of buying the R75 shown above? If the kiwi dollar is around 50pc of sterling, I'd snap it up. They ain't making any more of these and this one looks pretty good. If it has a gearbox problem eventually then get it fixed. That's the beauty of a classic and half the fun: they are not disposable consumer items.
 


Back
Top Bottom