I still think this is related to the traction control, as TC works by cutting the power/ applying the brakes. Judging by the number of times it flashes away, this could be the reason for the premature wear of the pads.


I still think this is related to the traction control, as TC works by cutting the power/ applying the brakes. Judging by the number of times it flashes away, this could be the reason for the premature wear of the pads.![]()
Does the TC really apply the brakes??? I dont know but would be surprised if it did.
I thought that it just reduced engine output power by closing the throttle or cutting the spark or cutting the fuel supply? Automatically applying the brakes sounds dodgy to me, especially if cornering.

I'm no engineerP), but it needs to cut the power in the fraction of a second. It could well be a combination of brakes and cutting the fuel supply, but I'd have thought that cutting the fuel supply/ spark alone wouldn't be as effective. I am just guessing though!
![]()
I suspect that people who generally do a lot of braking are the ones who get through rear pads rapidly simply because of the linked brakes????.
Well removing the fuel or spark or closing the throttle will do that. No spark = instantly no power in that power cycle, no fuel injected on any particular power cycle = no power on that cycle, closing the throttle might be the slowest response I guess but it depends if fuel is cut at the same time - I really don't know much more than this, but to automatically apply the rear brake seems a bit dangerous to me because with limited rear grip (wheel spinning relative to the front wheel) to my mind would just make matters worse, especially when cornering.
I have noticed that the combined brakes on my new TE feel like quite a lot of rear brake is being applied to keep the bike stable even when braking relatively lightly with only the front lever - after only 300 miles there's is noticeable brake dust on my rear drive.
I suspect that people who generally do a lot of braking are the ones who get through rear pads rapidly simply because of the linked brakes????.
Stating the bleeding obvious there chapster![]()
Agree.At very slow speed the back brake does seem to kick in noticeably if grabbing the front, i noticed it for definate when i first got the bike, less so now, so it is just the linked brakes im sure. Nothing to do with traction control or cruise.
Every time we press the front or back brake lever the bike is directing braking effort to both front and back calipers. Perhaps the bias is more on the rear than previously.
At very slow speed the back brake does seem to kick in noticeably if grabbing the front, i noticed it for definate when i first got the bike, less so now, so it is just the linked brakes im sure. Nothing to do with traction control or cruise.
Every time we press the front or back brake lever the bike is directing braking effort to both front and back calipers. Perhaps the bias is more on the rear than previously.
My Nav 5 always seems to record a much greater number of rear brake applications than the front brake even though I only use the rear brake for hill starts - maybe once or twice in one outing. I assume the Nav 5 numbers mean the number of brake applications and not something else?
I have noticed this as well. I am wondering if you can reset this, then I would go out for a short ride, count the number of times I used the front brake (not touching the back at all) and have a look at the end of the short ride.