Sold Rokker Rokkertec slim jeans 36/30

[Daffy]

As above, I bought these to replace another pair when they die but they just keep going so I’m going to let these go to clear some space in the wardrobe.

I bought them last year for the summer and probably wore them a couple of times but they are clean and as new.

They are a tapered jean so are good with short boots but you wouldn’t get them over adventure type boots unless you’ve matchsticks for calves.

What about £150 posted.

 

[Daffy]

No one - too expensive?

 

[DS]

Are they true to size or do they come up bigger in the waist?

 

[Daffy]

Are they true to size or do they come up bigger in the waist?

They’re true to size I’d say, saying that they’ve got a bit of stretch in them - I’m a 36 and I’d wear a belt with these but they aren’t baggy through the legs..

 

[Daffy]

Saturday bump, anyone want a pair of as new Rokker jeans at half price?

 

[King Rat]

As above, I bought these to replace another pair when they die but they just keep going so I’m going to let these go to clear some space in the wardrobe.

I bought them last year for the summer and probably wore them a couple of times but they are clean and as new.

They are a tapered jean so are good with short boots but you wouldn’t get them over adventure type boots unless you’ve matchsticks for calves.

What about £150 posted.

View attachment 456377
View attachment 456376View attachment 456378

Oh the irony, the title and the waist size.

 

[casbar]

Oh the irony, the title and the waist size.

Not really, the slim refers to the cut of the legs, ie not dad jeans cut. Not the waist size.

 

[King Rat]

Not really, the slim refers to the cut of the legs, ie not dad jeans cut. Not the waist size.

it was humour, not litteral.

 

[casbar]

it was humour, not litteral.

Glad you pointed that out, I hadn't realised