Update.
Had a rummage under the rubber boot and all seems well lubricated and quite free, as was the cable when disconnected.
Funny thing was, the spring (item #4 in the realoem drawing, the one between the cover and the piston) was missing altogether. Actually I don't think its absence makes any difference in the pull required at the lever but my question now is whether it's worth the bother of getting another one nowthisminute, because as far as I can see all it does is put a small residual tension on the cable to stop the lever flapping about. Whaddyareckon?

I'll pop a spring in when I get one with my next order from Motor Works, it's just that I'm curious, that's all.
Another thing that puzzles me- well,
annoys me rather- is the fact that for the first few pulls on the lever after having a look at everything it was definitely lighter i.e. easier to pull, but then seemed to go back to the original heaviness. Everything is lubricated; handlebar lever, the needle bearing in the operating arm, the nipple at the g'box end of the cable, and, as said, the piston #2, housing the thrust bearing. I'm buggered if I can think of anything that might cause this variation though. Oh, I haven't lubricated the cable, Steptoe said a while back that I shouldn't, and if I remember correctly the label on the cable also said the same thing. I've had three cables in the last few years and the clutch has always been heavy. Also it was heavy before having the gearbox out, the bastard has been heavy for as long as I can remember. Well, not quite perhaps, it was light when the bike was new in 1982.
So the way things are going I'll be looking at Kenny's suggestion, although I'm a bit puzzled, you say
"with the gearbox still in the bike", do you mean after separating the gearbox from the engine but with both still in the frame?