TBM
I thought the TBM test was really interesting on a lot of levels
First off there has been loads of talk recently about the death of magazines as t'internet takes over and Timolgras Mongolian RR is a perfect example.
But (as a photographer and motorcyclist) I thought TBM had done a pretty damn good job with their test and produced a good quality item - great pictures, printed on good quality paper and an interesting read. Hell I even parted with my own money to buy a copy
But I have to agree with the sentiment of the test - for me the new Tenere just does not stir the soul in the way a motorcycle should. To me, my bike is just a toy and I don't commute on it or anything like that. So it needs to shout out to me from the garage "Oi, lets go out ! Now" And the new Tenere never really did. I sold mine on here to fund an extension but for less than half the cost of a s/h Tenere I got one of the very first Teneres (1983) and the bike just oozes style and has that almost indefinable thing, charisma. It just doffs along beautifully like a big thumper should and I did 150 miles yesterday into Wales for no other reason than it was sunny. 30 litre tank, nice and light, great looks, my 7 year old son could fix it, 18 inch rear, it's all good.
The new Tenere seems to be a victim of modernity, rather than a beneficiary. Built to a budget by accountants, all style over substance, and an emmission consious

confused

engine that was very nearly strangled at birth by catalytics and other modern stuff I could live without.
In the Teneres favour, they are cheap. Secondhand ones don't sell for much over £4k very easily and I know people have done great things on them. For sure they are reliable and as a modern Jap bike, they are very much a bike you can hop on and off, "turn the key and go" sort of thing.
They seem to be a "ride and forget" sort of bike and perhaps that is both its strength and undoing.
I can see why a similar V-twin sort of bike might stir the soul a little more