Had some spare time today so popped into my local BM dealer and blagged an hour or two on the new WC, what a mistake to make, I so want one now 



Had some spare time today so popped into my local BM dealer and blagged an hour or two on the new WC, what a mistake to make, I so want one now![]()
yes , great bike.
did you test a GS or a GSA ?

Had some spare time today so popped into my local BM dealer and blagged an hour or two on the new WC, what a mistake to make, I so want one now![]()

You could always spend 10 minutes on here reading the numerous reports on how the corrosion starts shortly after you lose sight of the showroom ! Nice bikes let down by a very poor finish and numerous dealers who don't give a shit because they know the lemmings will keep on coming.

You can always rely on one of the usual suspects (who has never owned one) to chip in with their "wisdom"![]()
Did 150 miles on Saturday on mixed roads on my 2014 gsa lc, suspension is still overly firm and doesn't like poor road surfaces, the bike is only really happy when being thrashed and dislikes being run at lower speeds and needs revs to thrive. The box is far from slick and the electronics are excessive it seems to have been designed to please you when you thrash it on a test ride and then buy one.
Now went out today on my 2011 r1200gsa tc (15,000 miles on the clock) and did 180 miles out over Alston into the lakes and back via Nenthead and Weardale, despite bad weather and the temps dropping down to 2 degrees over Alston the weather dried up on the way back.
Now I know on paper the lc is more powerful and has more torque but sticking to the speed limits the older bike is far nicer to ride it FEELS more powerful , it is more planted on the road especially on poorly surfaced roads and at legal speeds just feels like a much more competent and developed bike.
I just can't help getting the feeling when haven ridden the lc that BMW have gone too far in attempting to compete with ktm and give it more power, make it feel sportier and give it more electronic fancies rather than making it a better real world bike than the older 1200 tc model.
Still think that I may end up with keeping the yellow one and binning the blue
Did 150 miles on Saturday on mixed roads on my 2014 gsa lc, suspension is still overly firm and doesn't like poor road surfaces, the bike is only really happy when being thrashed and dislikes being run at lower speeds and needs revs to thrive. The box is far from slick and the electronics are excessive it seems to have been designed to please you when you thrash it on a test ride and then buy one.
Now went out today on my 2011 r1200gsa tc (15,000 miles on the clock) and did 180 miles out over Alston into the lakes and back via Nenthead and Weardale, despite bad weather and the temps dropping down to 2 degrees over Alston the weather dried up on the way back.
Now I know on paper the lc is more powerful and has more torque but sticking to the speed limits the older bike is far nicer to ride it FEELS more powerful , it is more planted on the road especially on poorly surfaced roads and at legal speeds just feels like a much more competent and developed bike.
I just can't help getting the feeling when haven ridden the lc that BMW have gone too far in attempting to compete with ktm and give it more power, make it feel sportier and give it more electronic fancies rather than making it a better real world bike than the older 1200 tc model.
Still think that I may end up with keeping the yellow one and binning the blue

No my bike was back to bmw for a full 7 weeks and there is apparently absolutely nothing the matter with it now.
Neither it nor the 3 other 2014 gsa lc's and the one 2015 gsa lc I have ridden have been as nice to ride at sensible road speeds as my older gsa tc

