This months Bike Magazine

Discussing the merits of an alternative bike in a section almost entirely populated by those who have already committed to the WC is probably the most futile exercise I can think of :blast

As you would think telling owners the bike is too plastic, too fast, too prone to headshakes, has too flimsy switch gear etc.....but there are still a horde who so. As you say, futile...
 
Its a small point but one of the few 'complaints' in the article was about the back of the riders legs getting covered in crap from the rear wheel . I notice that this seems to have badly afflicted all previous incarnations of the 12 so much so that everyone seems to fit those mudslinger thingies. Surprised that haven't fixed it with the new one.......that is all:P
They don't want to put after-market accessories manufacturers out of business. Like horn makers, seat makers, screen makers, headlight and lamp makers, panniers makers...
 
As you would think telling owners the bike is too plastic, too fast, too prone to headshakes, has too flimsy switch gear etc.....but there are still a horde who so. As you say, futile...
What IS futile is discussing entirely non-existant issues, like headshake, too flimsy switchgear, too fast (now, that's a good one), too much plastic... No, let me re-phrase this last one: discussing plastic is not futile, but then it will end with «Did they have to use all that steel? Now the bike weighs a ton!», or «Did they have to us all that aluminium? Now the bike is so expensive!»
 
Discussing the merits of an alternative bike in a section almost entirely populated by those who have already committed to the WC is probably the most futile exercise I can think of :blast
Totally. I think they should open a new section titled «Discussing the merits of an alternative bike compared to a new bike by people who have never ridden it, and who don't plan to.»
 
Off road bikes are usually bedecked with plastic. It bends, is cheap and easy to fix.

The criticisms seem to be that the bike is not designed for off road as it has lots of plastic that might break.

I'm awaiting the alternative material suggestions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
 
Off road bikes are usually bedecked with plastic. It bends, is cheap and easy to fix.

The criticisms seem to be that the bike is not designed for off road as it has lots of plastic that might break.

I'm awaiting the alternative material suggestions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2

It's not about the plastics, it's about those two sticky out radiators that seem designed to do not a lot else other than to cushion the fall of the bike when (not IF) it goes over when offroading :beerjug:

Design, not materials.
 
Off road bikes are usually bedecked with plastic. It bends, is cheap and easy to fix.

The criticisms seem to be that the bike is not designed for off road as it has lots of plastic that might break.

I'm awaiting the alternative material suggestions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2

That's right, off road plastics are cheap, how much are the wc plastics :eek:

Plastic is fine, but the forward rad covers look vunerable and unnecessary to me for off roading.

Anyway, you can stay out of it, you've just made your plastics 200 quid dearer than they shouod be;):D
 
That's right, off road plastics are cheap, how much are the wc plastics :eek:

Plastic is fine, but the forward rad covers look vunerable and unnecessary to me for off roading.

Anyway, you can stay out of it, you've just made your plastics 200 quid dearer than they shouod be;):D

Yeah, but much lighter now they are wrapped in carbon...
 
Getting back to pillion comfort.
I would imagine that most GS pillions are going to be female, and some may be larger than a size 12 ?
I believe that it's the grab rail and the positioning of the panniers which may make this bike uncomfortable for some pillions on long journeys.

Anyone over a size 12 and especially attired in heavy winter riding gear is going to find that the grab rail gives very little room to shuffle and in fact will start to dig in after a while,it's also a little to high to be in a natural grab position.
The vario panniers also appear to mount slightly to far forward therefore impeding the pillions ability to shift themselves on the balls of their feet.

This is one of several reasons that I've decided to adapt my existing ADV rear rack to fit the new bike,and to go with TT Zega pro panniers.

1, The grab rail on the new bike does not lend itself to laying a tent across the back with the rear seat removed.

2, The grab rail on the new bike is to high and in an unnatural position for a pillion.

3,The pillion can be squashed into the grab rail making it difficult to grab and uncomfortable on a long journey.

4, Apart from never having been a fan of vario panniers if you compare how they mount in relation to Zega pros they are about 3" further forward which tends to mean that the pillion can't get their feet back onto the balls which again makes it difficult to move around.

So for anyone who regularly carries a pillion over any distance and is considering a new lc/wc/wb think long and hard about your luggage. :thumb

Steve









3,
 
Getting back to pillion comfort.
I would imagine that most GS pillions are going to be female, and some may be larger than a size 12 ?
I believe that it's the grab rail and the positioning of the panniers which may make this bike uncomfortable for some pillions on long journeys.

Anyone over a size 12 and especially attired in heavy winter riding gear is going to find that the grab rail gives very little room to shuffle and in fact will start to dig in after a while,it's also a little to high to be in a natural grab position.
The vario panniers also appear to mount slightly to far forward therefore impeding the pillions ability to shift themselves on the balls of their feet.

So for anyone who regularly carries a pillion over any distance and is considering a new lc/wc/wb think long and hard about your luggage. :thumb

Sounds more like we should dump the size 12 salad-dodgers and upgrade to size 8 sylphs.... A process I am well under way with...,
 
My missus is a size 10. I gave her a whole afternoon on the back of the demo bike and she was quick to say that it wasn't as comfortable as our GSA. I guess we'll either invest in an air-hawk or a trip to Tony Archer to keep her quiet ... :rolleyes:
 
My missus is a size 10. I gave her a whole afternoon on the back of the demo bike and she was quick to say that it wasn't as comfortable as our GSA. I guess we'll either invest in an air-hawk or a trip to Tony Archer to keep her quiet ... :rolleyes:

Joanne is a 10/12 and it was the grab rail that made it uncomfortable for her, she felt the seat was OK ,plus the panniers restricted her from getting the balls of her feet on the pegs.

Did you take your missus out with pannier on ?

Steve
 
Joanne is a 10/12 and it was the grab rail that made it uncomfortable for her, she felt the seat was OK ,plus the panniers restricted her from getting the balls of her feet on the pegs.

Did you take your missus out with pannier on ?

Steve

We're all different. We've just done over 600 miles 2 up with 3 x Varios and the missus is a 12/14. She found the LC much more comfortable than our old TC. Only problem with the grab rails was difficulty in getting on in full winter gear. I transferred the lower rear footpeg kit over from the TC which makes it easier to get on, she has short legs!
 


Back
Top Bottom