Triumph TR6C 1967 and 1968

Number 6

Well-known member
UKGSer Subscriber
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
3,830
Reaction score
1,345
Location
Lancashire
Following on from my earlier thread of the T120C TT restoration, here's an update on the two TR6Cs. This will be short and sweet, all the detail is in the other thread. (y)

For a long time I've wanted a Triumph TR6C which is a model that was mainly sold to the USA market where it was used as a road bike and also for desert racing where it acquired the nickname of 'Desert Sled'. It was based on the standard TR6 Trophy Roadster but had some modifications to make it suitable for off-roading which included Quickly Detachable headlight, rigid mounted handlebars, folding footrests, battery-less Energy Transfer ignition, high level exhaust pipes, sump guard and a Dunlop Trials Universal rear tyre but strangely a Dunlop K70 front road tyre :nenau

In 2017 I bought a fairly complete 1968 project bike with the all important matching frame and engine numbers. This is how it was advertised :-

1.jpg

It had the wrong fork yokes and the front brake was only the 7" Twin Leading Shoe version which I didn't realise at the time, it should have had the 8" brake. The seat was rusted beyond repair, the fuel tank is off a T140 and the exhaust headers are from a 1969-70 TR6C. I bought it anyway and it sat for a few years whilst I collected all the bits for the rebuild. During this time a US Ebay seller who I'd already bought quite a few bits from, listed a 1967 TR6C front frame section and also the matching numbers bare crankcase halves. Being a glutton for punishment I bought them too. :rolleyes:

I'd already built a 1967 Bonneville T120R and a 1969 Trident T150, both from bare crankcases and frames so I knew this wasn't an easy option.

These are the '67 TR6C parts that I started with.

3.jpg

9.JPG

So I now had to find two sets of all the rare parts for these two bikes which took quite some time. I finally started on the rebuilds in November 2024, at the same time as I did the T120C TT, I found it was the easiest and quickest way to ensure that all three bikes were completed without losing interest in any of them.

Here are some original New Old Stock Lucas electrical bits, not the modern 'Lucas in name only' parts that are made abroad and are not very good quality.

IMG_20251211_145643_HDR.jpg


IMG_20260201_152237_HDR.jpg

I also fitted these oil filters in the tank return lines.

IMG_20260110_142934_HDR.jpg



As of today, 17th March 2026, both TR6Cs are finished, taxed and insured and I did 26 miles on the '67 bike today on a short shakedown run and only had one problem with a slightly slipping clutch. (y)

The finished bikes.

IMG_20260313_152931_HDR.jpg

IMG_20260313_145929_HDR.jpg

The '67 today after road test. I'm hoping to get out on the '68 tomorrow. (y)

IMG_20260317_151457_HDR.jpg

IMG_20260313_145936_HDR.jpg
 
Last edited:
Fabulous workmanship, engineering and attention to detail. Very tidy if I may say so.
 
Rev counter drive from Exhaust cam shaft, but no right angle gearbox or cable or instrument ?
 
Nice tread. Interesting how you state that the modern Lucas stuff is not good quality. Does that mean that you’re defending the prince of darkness? JJH
 
The blue one looks fantastic.
 
Good news :)............... and bad news :mad:.

I fixed the clutch slip on the '67. I had 20/50 engine oil in the primary drive which I'm not keen on, it can stick the plates together and cause both clutch drag and slip. I stripped it all down, cleaned off the plates, increased the preload on the springs and refilled the primary with Automatic Transmission Fluid and it's now working beautifully. (y)

The bad news is that I took the '68 out for its first run, after a few miles it seemed to go a bit flat and I thought it was pinking under load. I headed back home and as I turned off the by-pass I suddenly couldn't get any gears at all. Fortunately I was only about 300 yards from home so pushed it back, I'm glad it wasn't the Trident! I had an idea what might have happened and when I removed the primary cover I was proved correct. I've fitted belt drives to five bikes previously and never had a problem. My '67 Bonneville has exactly the same belt drive as this from the same supplier and has been on for 4 years with no issues at all, this belt lasted no more than 12 miles.

The smell was horrendous. There appears to be no damage other than the belt, I'll pull it apart in the next few days and see if there's any obvious reason.

10.jpg

9.jpg

11.jpg


What it should look like (my '67 Bonneville) and that's after 1500 miles.

WP_20230201_12_02_19_Pro.jpg
 
Last edited:
Good news :)............... and bad news :mad:.

I fixed the clutch slip on the '67. I had 20/50 engine oil in the primary drive which I'm not keen on, it can stick the plates together and cause both clutch drag and slip. I stripped it all down, cleaned off the plates, increased the preload on the springs and refilled the primary with Automatic Transmission Fluid and it's now working beautifully. (y)

The bad news is that I took the '68 out for its first run, after a few miles it seemed to go a bit flat and I thought it was pinking under load. I headed back home and as I turned off the by-pass I suddenly couldn't get any gears at all. Fortunately I was only about 300 yards from home so pushed it back, I'm glad it wasn't the Trident! I had an idea what might have happened and when I removed the primary cover I was proved correct. I've fitted belt drives to five bikes previously and never had a problem. My '67 Bonneville has exactly the same belt drive as this from the same supplier and has been on for 4 years with no issues at all, this belt lasted no more than 12 miles.

The smell was horrendous. There appears to be no damage other than the belt, I'll pull it apart in the next few days and see if there's any obvious reason.

View attachment 487585

View attachment 487586

View attachment 487587


What it should look like (my '67 Bonneville) and that's after 1500 miles.

View attachment 487588
The bikes look fantastic, well done to you.
 
It'll be interesting to know what's caused the belt failure, I don't imagine they're cheap.
 
I suspect a Chinese copy of the original belt….sold as correct, but actually a cheap nasty fake branded to look like the original.

Sad this sort of thing happens ….i had the same with a triumph primary shoe….. the plastic ain’t right and broke into bits in no time. Thankfully a friend got a correct NOS for me…… no problems at all then.

No6 …..bikes look great, sorry to hear of the tribulations with the belt primary ( change the clutch basket etc etc etc and go back to chain primary?
 
A wonderful job Number 6, bikes from my era - absolutely stunners.

I would also be interested re the mashed belt. I've run them on motorbikes and push bikes. Like you, without issues.
 
Last edited:
It'll be interesting to know what's caused the belt failure, I don't imagine they're cheap.

Well the alternator stator is buggered too, there's been some serious heat in there.

14.jpg

IMG_20260322_145640_HDR.jpg

The rotor is blackened with molten belt material.....

16.jpg

I then looked more closely at the rotor and stator and there were obvious signs of rubbing, there should be an 0.008" air gap between them. I think what has happened is that the rotor and stator were making contact and the resulting friction and heat caused the belt to melt and disintegrate. The rotor has obviously been very hot and it is clamped up against the crankshaft belt pulley which has then put the heat into the belt. I've ordered a new belt and stator and also a new crankshaft oil seal as that would have had some serious heat put into it also. The rotor cleaned up nicely in the lathe, there's no apparent damage, just melted-on belt material.

IMG_20260322_185431_HDR.jpg

(the front pulley keeper plate is not in place on the above picture)

I'll update when it's back together and running, I'll run it without the primary drive cover for a while to keep an eye on things. (y)
 


Back
Top Bottom