Is LESS expensive than tpft?
Why fully comprehensive?
- Thread starter Captain jack
- Start date
It would be easier to unpick the philosophical evidential problem of evil than to make sense of bike insurance.
Because they want to charge you a certain amount and maintain profits
They’d would then be no ability to charge the extortionate rates for bike hire
According to a Google search, it is because insurers assess that those customers who inly buy limited coverage (ie less than fully comprehensive) are more likely to come into contact (literally) with a third party, than those that don’t.
Look at the positives though. If an insurer is prepared to insure a vehicle fully comprehensively for less (ie cheaper) than they’d insure the same vehicle for limited coverage, that’s a plus, surely?
Look at the positives though. If an insurer is prepared to insure a vehicle fully comprehensively for less (ie cheaper) than they’d insure the same vehicle for limited coverage, that’s a plus, surely?
Similar threads
