Yes or no. Scottish residents only please

yes, no or undecided


  • Total voters
    133
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
You 'no' guys are so knowledgeable and certain of the future.

I found a wee graph. I'm presuming that its accurate. BT (before thatcher) the percentage of conservative voters was quite healthy enough to provide a decent balance.

If it has permanently changed, one has got to ask why. If it changed because of perceived unfairness dealt to us by an English dominated government, then, with our own parliament there is no reason for it not to go back to what it was.

I agree. The problem is that the damage that will be done in the interim by the first few terms of a socialist government will be fatal for a newly independent country. Right wing governments are better for the economy but they are not magicians. If the economy is as trashed as I think it could be we would require decades of austerity to repair the damage.
 
Quite who they think is going to plough the millions of pounds into the rural economy to replace this enormous flow of cash from estate owners is not clear. The tenant on a large chunk of Invercauld Estate has recently increased his game-keeping staff from 3 to 8. That potentially is 8 households and families living and working in the countryside. The same man has spent 2 million quid on doing up the house. He is spending millions more on the estate infrastructure.

I'm waiting for a note from your mother to explain your absence from the last Blackloonies??

Speaking of the Blackwater Hall,Gerry, I noticed a photo on the wall which showed the teacher and pupils of Blackwater school in 1956. There were 17 pupils, a teacher and another adult who may have been employed as a caretaker, cook etc. I'd be interested to know how many families with children lived in the area at the time and what they did? It would be interesting to find out where those kids are now also. My bet is that few of them (who are alive) will live in the area and not a few will live furth of Scotland. I'd be really interested to know how many children of school age (5 - 12) live in the area NOW and what their families do.

I suspect the answers to those questions might just put a large dent in your argument that the only people whose opinions matter re land use in Scotland are the people who own and benefit from its use today. That's the kind of thinking which led to the de-population of rural Scotland in the first place.

I'm not a nationalist and I still have several months before I put my cross on the ballot paper but I'm a great believer that if we keep on doing what we've always done, we'll keep on getting what we've always got.
 
It must be nice to be able to predict the future with such clarity, you should bet on the horses.

Look at the graph in the post above yours. It is not rocket science. And I never risk my money betting on horses any more than I would risk my money by betting that the SNP predictions of prosperity in a socialist Scotland would come true.
 
Look at the graph in the post above yours. It is not rocket science. And I never risk my money betting on horses any more than I would risk my money by betting that the SNP predictions of prosperity in a socialist Scotland would come true.

Yeah but you've obviously got your silly right-wing blinkers on. ;)
 
I was unsure about how to vote. Thankfully, the Express has helped greatly....

Edit: I see Toddy beat me to it. Not something to brag about. Mind you, it could be worse. I could have been beaten to it by Benny The Bus Driver. How would you ever live that one down? :D
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    113.5 KB · Views: 301
Danny Alexander doesn't know hid bank bail out from his elbow!

Danny Alexander gave a speech at The Scotland Office this morning regarding independence and I’ve just seen this snippet in the Herald online:

“Outlining what he calls ludicrous myths, he questioned whether Scotland would be able to bail out banks, given the size of the financial sector north of the border.”

Right, Danny Alexander really has no place working in the Treasury department if this is what he thinks because what he’s said here just proves that he doesn’t know his bank bail out from his elbow.

FACTS about the bank bail out.

1) the ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND, that Scottish bank they keep telling us we wouldn’t have been able to bail out if we were an independent country, only operates around 10% of its business IN Scotland. Yes, that’s right, that Scottish bank operates 90% of its business OUTSIDE of Scotland.

2) Scotland had nothing to do with the way in which banks were regulated. This responsibility fell solely on the UK Government.

3) The majority of poor decisions and losses which led to RBS’s financial crisis derived from their London based businesses. Around 80% in fact.

4) RBS’s corporation tax went straight to the UK Government, and as such was not included as a Scottish revenue (funny that, considering it’s a “Scottish bank”)

5) the UK bail out of RBS by taxpayers was £45billion, quite a substantial sum of which Scotland’s share was around 10%. Had we been an independent country, given that only 10% of the bank’s business operates IN Scotland, our share of the bail out would have been roughly the same. However, had we been independent, we would have seen an increase in revenue from the bank’s corporation tax, and employees NI contributions which currently are sent straight to Westminster.

6) The UK didn’t bail out RBS on its own, considering the Federal Reserve in America made £285 BILLION available, it could be argued that our good friends across the water bailed them out.

Why would they do that? Well because that’s how bank bail outs work. Bank’s are jointly bailed out in countries where they have business operations and assets located, in order to protect the economy of those countries. The amount of money which they use to aid the bail out, depends on the level of activity.

That’s why when Barclays Bank (Head Office in Canary Wharf) needed bailed out, it wasn’t only the UK who shoved money at it, but also the US Federal Reserve again, and also Qatar, in what was the single largest bail out package of any British bank.

He also said:

“In short, there is more evidence for the Loch Ness monster than there is for many of the calculations and the claims that have been put forward by the nationalists to support their case for separation.”

Well Danny, I think there’s more evidence to support the Loch Ness Monster than there is to support you having a job come March 2016. Tick Tock Danny.
 
Craig Murray Podcast 71

For the 71st episode of The Scottish Independence Podcast I spoke with Craig Murray. Craig is a former UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan, a post which he resigned in protest over what he saw as the collusion of the UK government in torture. In his career he has also held Foreign Office positions in the EU…

https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sha...nnect&apikey=df4f5f79092ceea47fc73e3696c136f7
 
I was unsure about how to vote. Thankfully, the Express has helped greatly....

Edit: I see Toddy beat me to it. Not something to brag about. Mind you, it could be worse. I could have been beaten to it by Benny The Bus Driver. How would you ever live that one down? :D
No change on My Moyes story though so it must be accurate....... Stockport County would snap him up as would Stranraer
 
Sunday Herald

At long last Someone has worked out how to sell newspapers.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    83.4 KB · Views: 205
and apparently oil rich Norway pays more than anyone else according to Bloomberg. Norway $10.08 and Canada $4.67, the UK $7.75 (figures from Sept 2013) for 1 gallon reg gasoline. Fuel for thought?
 

It should be funny North but it isn't. The Nats say that 'Scotland's' oilfields (they are the UK's oilfields actually) produce 100 times the amount of oil that Canada's oilfields produce when in fact Canada's oilfields produce 3.86 million bbl/day compared to the UK's 1.01bbl/day and no one challenges the lie and would only be shouted down and attacked by the Nats if they did.

Another good example is Alex Salmon stating an Independent Scotland would happily be able to continue to use the £ even though it has been pointed out by the Bank of England and every major politician (and carefully explained why) that as a foreign country Scotland can choose to trade in £s but will have no say in monetary policy over the currency and that independent countries need their own currency. Anyone who disagrees with Salmon or the Nats is intimidated and bullied while Salmon and the Nats simultaneously weep and nash their teeth that they are being bullied.

Toddy is a how the Nats work; relentless propaganda and empty rhetoric to drown out any sensible debate and never answer sensibly how an independent Scotland would operate. All they have to offer is ugly nationalism that won't run the show or pay the bills, Toddy's relentless cut and paste lies and propaganda won't change that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Back
Top Bottom