I was seduced by the T100, & bought one 2 years ago. Similar to the Scrambler, but more (?) road oriented & with a 360 degree crank. Timolgra's right; it can't be an 'only' bike - it has too many limitations. The shocks are, well, shocking & I keep meaning to relace with IKONs. The Ohlins (I saw the 2 bikes on dispaly at the NEC) look fabulous, but are expensive & can't dial out everything. The gearing is all wrong too - you are always hunting for 6th, & that's with an 18-tooth sprocket. Oddly, the Scrambler is much better geared for road use.
On the plus side, the engine is a peach. Liberated with a set of Norman Hyde TOGAs, it sounds fantastic and runs so much better (re-jetted & air induction kit removed). The gearbox is up to Honda standards. I've ridden the bike through 2 winters, and the finish is fine. There's the odd bit of corrosion, but nothing to get upset about.
To be honest, for the money, there are better looking & better value bikes. £6000 buys a lot these days - I quite fancy the Ducati 696 Monster. The Bonnie really feels built down to a price, & you can spend a huge amount making it into a decent machine. The same is true with the Scrambler, if not more so; it looks as if it should do so much more. But can't. Which is a shame.
I'll keep mine. I like its looks & I don't feel that my old SpeedTwin is really safe on the roads these days (no indicators, nagging worries about reliability tho' it has never let me down, etc), & the Bonnie kind of feels the same. But the real reason I won't sell it is the huge depreciation. I'd rather keep it, & get something else.
If my missus lets me