Greggers
Registered user
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2008
- Messages
- 1,285
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi Martin..
I've used both, and they each have their virtues...
I used a 'skin on my 950 'S' seat for the Morocco tour a couple of years ago - it made the difference between agony and useability for me.. Problems can be getting it to stay in one place, keeping it dry etc.. my skin is in fact a child's push-chair liner, and the wool is incredibly thick, and I think it is this which makes it work - some fleeces are thin and do nothing, don't even bother looking at a synthetic cos they're just shite...
The Airhawk is an oddity - it takes a bit of jiggling and air 'in-and-outing' to get it right. I used one on the seat of my TRX - a Yamaha Sports(ish) bike - and I could never quite be happy with the squishy feeling of separation from the seat... It worked a treat though and was very comfortable..
No doubt about it though - an ADV bike with a skin looks the business while the Airhark belongs under some fat arse on a Harley...
Greg
I've used both, and they each have their virtues...
I used a 'skin on my 950 'S' seat for the Morocco tour a couple of years ago - it made the difference between agony and useability for me.. Problems can be getting it to stay in one place, keeping it dry etc.. my skin is in fact a child's push-chair liner, and the wool is incredibly thick, and I think it is this which makes it work - some fleeces are thin and do nothing, don't even bother looking at a synthetic cos they're just shite...
The Airhawk is an oddity - it takes a bit of jiggling and air 'in-and-outing' to get it right. I used one on the seat of my TRX - a Yamaha Sports(ish) bike - and I could never quite be happy with the squishy feeling of separation from the seat... It worked a treat though and was very comfortable..
No doubt about it though - an ADV bike with a skin looks the business while the Airhark belongs under some fat arse on a Harley...
Greg



