
I currently have a 2005 1200GS which Ive owned from brand new and cherished over its 6000 miles or so and it is in like new condition.
I was thinking of upgrading to a 2010 model,again brand new and was wondering if there was a big difference between the 2 models and if the outlay was worth it to change(I'd estimate it would cost me around £5000)
Could you tell us why?![]()


Could you tell us why?![]()
(Tourance EXP's fitted on 10 plate, Tourance NON EXP on my own bike which has never had the same feeling).
Why don't ya take a test ride and judge for yourself
Best regards Stretch![]()
ones last year and dont really want to spend another 2.5k if its soooooo much better 
I won't be upgrading from my 09... definately not enough difference ... apart from the price![]()
.
Had a go on the 2010 today but I wont be buying one.
The engine certainly pulls harder from 3000 but doesnt seem to have the top end power of my 09. I accept the bike only had 500 miles on it so still alittle tight.
I climbed back on mine and actually preferred it![]()

Could you tell us why?![]()
. . . I would probably not have changed if my old bike had such low milage and I used it so little.
But, hey, if you want it and you can afford it then why not.
![]()
Spend some money on remus decat headers and a pcv with autotune and have more power through out the rev range than a 10 for around £600 with out the added complication of sticky exhaust valves and servos,then save your money for the wasser boxer![]()
I currently have a 2005 1200GS .....
I was thinking of upgrading to a 2010 model ... and was wondering if there was a big difference between the 2 models and if the outlay was worth it to change
Thats the problem,my current bike is like new,never used in wet weather and kept in an insulated garage over the winter months.
Am I going to be paying out a lot of cash for nothing?!
