Re: Running Lights
silverfox said:
just a point but there is no such thing in the UK. just dipped beam.current road vehicles lighting regs only allow additional lamps in conjunction with main beam, further subsection deals with 'fog lamps' and heights from ground to lamp centres.
Yeah but if people feel safer who cares ? This is a debate in itself. Personally I feel much better with them on. I often try them off then put them on and every time drivers react positively, so that is cool.
So I guess if the perception is safer then "better to be judged by the jury than be injured (or worse) by one"
the same can said for the wide tail lights which will not conform to con and use regs although they do look good.
same as above, well apart from the "yeah".
Are you sure ? Can you point me to the regs ?
Why bother I ask myself. Well every so often this is mentioned and yet where are the words ? Would like to see them so please help. Would be nice to definitively know.
Regardless, from a practical point of view, MOT testers don't have an issue and Traffic cops don't have one either. One MOT tester is rigorous enough to fail any American style lighting but still passes Widetail. Of course regs may differ but at least the people I have met and who have seen them some of which are the above professions have no issue in fact the reverse seems to be the case, as they actively like them. Hence it would be interesting to see the regs. If nothing else to see that “the law” appears to be out of step with the practice that myself and others have experienced.
So I guess this is where you reveal you are a Ministry employee or the minister or a traffic policeman or lawyer or ?
Hope you can help coz I really don't know how to nail this issue.
Cheers
Simon T, I love the sig cool