2014 GSA compared to 2013 standard GS - first impressions

[lockwood]

I, like many others, couldn't wait for the latest 2014 GSA wc, ordering it in November last year. I currently own an April build 2013 GS wc fully spec'd with 4,000 k's (2,500 miles). So, if anything, I'd be biased towards the GSA, having waited so long for it.

My first 200k's impressions. Note: I've only done 200k's (120 miles)

I love the look (Olive Green) and size. If the standard GS fits you reasonably well, so will the GSA. I'm only 5' 8"

My GSA, is also fully spec'd. The gearbox is significantly smoother through the changes, doesn't çlunk' as much when engaging 1st gear at a standstill
The engine isn't as smooth as the standard GS, particularly at very low revs, disappointing to say the least, but the heavier flywheel isn't noticeable in any respect.
I haven't laboured the engine, but at revs below 2,000 on VERY LIGHT throttle, it is jerkier than the standard and has some quite strange noises, not loud, but there. It also seems to need a few more revs on take-off. I prefer the lower enduro box ratio on the previous GSA
Suspension and steering feel identical to the GS.
I got off the GSA and straight onto the GS. The GS felt almost like a sports bike in comparison, maybe it was just an impression because it is so much slimmer and I'm probably more used to it.
I am well aware that the GSA only has 200 k's on it and will loosen up over the next few thousand, but in all honesty I expected a bit more.

For the standard GS wc owners thinking of getting the GSA, wait a while before taking the leap, ride one first.

Originally I was going to sell the GS and just have the GSA. At the moment, I think I'll keep both and see how the GSA goes after a few more k's.

For the record, this is my 12th BMW and 6th GS or GSA since 2001

I'd be interested in other peoples first impressions.

cheers
John

 

[Robbo1200ADV]

i'm guessing it will take time to bed in , they do take time , nice to hear a real persons view though , chuck up a picture if you can Cheers

 

[Paul S]

John

Nice to see such a frank review

 

[roundincircles]

I have been riding the latest GS which has a many engine, clutch, gearbox and steering mods. It is a much softer exhaust noise and at 38 miles on delivery very 'stiff' engine wise. The gearchange is totally predictable as is finding neutral. The steering seems much faster than my bike but I guess that is a function of new tyres. Interestingly the different ESA settings make a more pronounced difference than my March 2013 GS WC.

Your heads up on the GSA is helpful and really no surprise but good to be reminded!

 

[APE]

People will still flock to the GSA because of it's 'presence' and 'planted feel' regardless of the relative merits. No point saying otherwise it won't get you anywhere...

 

[Wilsdorf]

Only 4k kiloms on your GS and it is no where near run in. My Twin Cam is still getting better after 11k miles in the last year, and I expect it will feel even better closer to 20k.

I'd expect the GSA to get a lot better with age. The tank range is the major improvement for me - but I'd prefer a 24-25 litre tank on a GS, with some more add-ons in the BMW catalogue.

I'm looking forward to riding the GS in Oz in the not too distant future.

 

[JohnnyBoxer]

People will still flock to the GSA because of it's 'presence' and 'planted feel' regardless of the relative merits. No point saying otherwise it won't get you anywhere...

The GSA is the man's bike as you say

 

[Bendy toy]

The Germans do seem to make engines that feel sluggish and rough at low revs when new. I had an Audi 1.9TDI 2002 (one of the last 1.9s). The demonstrator was amazing to use - so quick that I opened the bonnet to check it was the four banger. The new car stalled very easily or spun the wheels if I used a bit more throttle. But after 1000 miles it was a lots better and after 10,000 was just like that demonstrator if not better.

Im sure the the GS/GSA will be just the same. Give them time to bed in and dont be too gentle on the engine. They cylinders can glaze over too soon if its treated with kid gloves resulting in a tight engine.

But we know all this so use the bike with a firm hand and let us know how it develops over time.

 

[Engineer]

I have always preferred the standard GS from a riding point of view, generally lighter, sleeker and faster - The GSA has the advantage of a bigger tank and a little extra ground clearance, that's all - I suspect that 95% of buyers just like the Tonka Toy look, but its on the road dynamics can only be compromised when compared to the standard GS.

 

[APE]

The GSA is the man's bike as you say

more like a Fat Boys bike ?

 

[JohnnyBoxer]

more like a Fat Boys bike ?

If the cap fits

 

[Engineer]

more like a Fat Boys bike ?

That is probably the most accurate statement that you will ever read MCN could have saved loads of newsprint if they were as wise as you!

 

[Beemerman59]

Some of us need the extra inch.... in ride height. Some on this forum just need an extra inch to get over penis envy

 

[Nutty]

An interesting review.

Now, let's see some pictures.