Hi there folks, I'm about to pull the trigger on my first GSA and am unsure whether to get a 1250 with standard or low suspensions.
I've never owned a GS before (only a HD 883 for many years), therefore have no experience with tall / endure bikes. I'm 33 years-old, 1,82 (nearly 6ft tall) with a 33" inseam (84cm) with around 72kg and went to BMW to sit on the bikes and with the standard suspension with standard seat I was standing in the balls of both foots. Then I lowered the standard seat and could practically flat foot both foots. The bike was completely off (I've heard that it tends to get softer when it's on). I haven't had the chance to try the lowered suspension, as they did not have any in stock. I tried a GS1300 and was comfortably flatting both feet.
I plan to use it mostly for long distances asphalt rides with a lot of luggage + pillion - perhaps a very mild off-road every now and then. After reading lots of threads, I'm still not 100% sure, because:
- Lowered bike could be more comfortable to manoeuvre in low speed, especially with pillion and luggage and considering I don't have experience with tall bikes, but at the same time, lower suspension could not be ideal for a loaded bike.
- Lowered bike could also be better for asphalt and curves, as lower centre of gravity.
- Standard bike should be better for more loaded rides, but could be a bit of a hassle to manoeuvre in tricky situations.
- Standard bike could potentially give a better visibility / smoother riding experience.
Due to the triangle / peg distance, I would rather not buy a lowered seat, but, at max, adjust the standard seat to low. What I thought could be a good idea is to get the standard bike, use lowered seat adjustment for city rides and the high seat adjustment (normal) for long distances to preserve knees.
Trying them both is not much of an option, as I'm buying second hand and the local BMW does not have a lowered in stock.
Thanks a lot for any insights! Cheers.
I've never owned a GS before (only a HD 883 for many years), therefore have no experience with tall / endure bikes. I'm 33 years-old, 1,82 (nearly 6ft tall) with a 33" inseam (84cm) with around 72kg and went to BMW to sit on the bikes and with the standard suspension with standard seat I was standing in the balls of both foots. Then I lowered the standard seat and could practically flat foot both foots. The bike was completely off (I've heard that it tends to get softer when it's on). I haven't had the chance to try the lowered suspension, as they did not have any in stock. I tried a GS1300 and was comfortably flatting both feet.
I plan to use it mostly for long distances asphalt rides with a lot of luggage + pillion - perhaps a very mild off-road every now and then. After reading lots of threads, I'm still not 100% sure, because:
- Lowered bike could be more comfortable to manoeuvre in low speed, especially with pillion and luggage and considering I don't have experience with tall bikes, but at the same time, lower suspension could not be ideal for a loaded bike.
- Lowered bike could also be better for asphalt and curves, as lower centre of gravity.
- Standard bike should be better for more loaded rides, but could be a bit of a hassle to manoeuvre in tricky situations.
- Standard bike could potentially give a better visibility / smoother riding experience.
Due to the triangle / peg distance, I would rather not buy a lowered seat, but, at max, adjust the standard seat to low. What I thought could be a good idea is to get the standard bike, use lowered seat adjustment for city rides and the high seat adjustment (normal) for long distances to preserve knees.
Trying them both is not much of an option, as I'm buying second hand and the local BMW does not have a lowered in stock.
Thanks a lot for any insights! Cheers.
Plus a load of crap in my top case