sven
Registered user
I'm seriously toying with the idea of a GS Adventure, based on needing to slow down a bit on the straights but wanting a bike that I can throw around, plus the idea of a do-it all bke appeals as I do a fair bit of two up travel and touring - anyway test ride on saturday for half a day to try it out. Aside from that I also think the bike looks fantastic.
Firstly, if you like to throw a bike around in the bends, the standard GS has more precise handling than the GSA due to the shorter travel suspension and slightly lower centre of gravity - it's more confidence inspiring
ABS, ESA and heated grips are essential IMHO - the ESA suspension is firmer and better damped. The "Sport" setting kept my bike in shape when fully loaded with luggage and pillion when we went to the Alps this summer.
I really don't like the traction control as it's constantly cutting in in the lower gears as the front wheel lifts. The 2010 GSA we tested on Thursday was even more sensitive. Thankfully you can switch it off manually, although you need to do this before each ride.
The GSA screen is better, but a Givi Airflow screen on my bike is better still and only cost £135.
IMHO the only advantage the GSA offers is its looks and larger fuel tank. The standard GS is a better bike to ride
One point I would add is that the 2010 engine is much better, especially its roll-on performance in higher gears. £9-10k may get you a used 2010 GS in the next few months
