Thanks for this Russ and no your post didn't appear to me to be belittling but I was puzzled by the general thrust of some of the contributions (yours amongst them) to this thread. Let me explain.
Returning to the original title of this long-running thread, the answer "no" was given a long time ago and seems to have been tacitly accepted by most - yet the thread has continued. For me it has given a very interesting insight into how owners relate to their bikes. Ignoring some of the one line contributions which leave me wondering why they bother, my impression is of three broad groups/opinions. I am talking here of this thread and not of others which I think have "bled" into this one.
Group A contributors consists of the people who have had the well-documented common problems which I won't repeat. Their relationship with their bikes seems contradictory. On one hand they hate its unreliability but continue to keep it and ride it because it IS a brilliant ride. Even Marcus after his first unhappy experience went out and bought another one!

This group must be crackers because they whinge like hell then scratch their heads over the alternatives to persevering with the thing. I am in this group and I accept I am acting emotionally and irrationally in ignoring the facts and not trading the thing in for something marginally more reliable like a Hongdou.
There's group B who have had no problems with their bikes, offer "tea and sympathy" to Group A and move on. They are clearly delighted, say so and buzz off for another ride, untroubled by the "what might happen next" and "how much is my next ride going to cost" thoughts which afflict group A.
Then there's group C. Now this group gives most scope for analysing relationships and feelings towards a bike. They have had positive experiences too but try to explain Group A's reactions in a number of ways. These explanations for Group A's experience cover inter alia - rider stupidity, ignorance of manuals, iffy dealer support, fitting too many accessories and dodgy DIY. Assessing each of these explanations against my own experience leaves me with a big question. I hope I can be forgiven for assuming that having ridden bikes for 40 years, attained advanced qualifications and actually survived for that length of time with all my limbs intact I am entitled to discount rider stupidity. I also read manuals, BMW's own, Haynes and if one were available I would get a Clymer. I am very happy with my dealer. The only accessories fitted to my bike are a (dealer fitted) second socket and a hugger and I haven't time to do any DIY. So the question for my personal situation is why do members of Group C appear to find it difficult to accept that the weight of the evidence about the common problems I and others have experienced lead inexorably to the conclusion that the GS is a flawed genius? Brilliant to ride but too many have suffered with mechanical and electrical faults that should not be so prevalent in a so-called premier marque? It offers no comfort to me that VFR or other rider forums have similar threads. I don't have their bikes because I paid a premium to have something that was well-designed and reliable.
The answer to me is that riders strike up a very emotional attachment to their chosen steed (e.g. Group A) and it is possible that criticism of the bike creates in some people in Group C a sense of insecurity or a challenge to their decision to own it? From some of the posts I sometimes get the impression that there'd be less of a reaction if someone called their wife or girlfriend a slag.
To me the central point is this. We are (nearly) all owners of this bike. Criticism of it and BMW does not diminish anybody's personal decision to own it. If the results of the criticisms of Group A is to improve the bike and the way BMW address their customer responsibilities then are we not all winners? So why do contributors not accept at face value the weight of the actual evidence and work together on BMW to address it without calling into question the intelligence, experience, capability or motives of the GS/BMW critics?
Jeez that was difficult. Has anyone got any Anadin?