Wow. Those lean angles! The rocker covers must be just inches off the floor!
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Pegs and all
Average Throttle Position
- Thread starter Warlord
- Start date
Pegs and all
Is that what u mean WarlordNo mate. Trip to Scotland
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
No mate. Trip to Scotland
You know what that means now, don't you.
Scotland is the best riding roads....
Mildly envious. Just don't have the skills to ride like that.
Presumably footpegs are a consumable in your bike
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Keep riding and the gs will let you get away with murder . It’s a great bike , somewhat slated at times but it will reward you with pecise handling and allow you to get yer pegs down at some point .Mildly envious. Just don't have the skills to ride like that.
Presumably footpegs are a consumable in your bike
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Deleted account 191119001
Registered user
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2017
- Messages
- 12,798
- Reaction score
- 9
Upped my game today. average speed 49 km/h forest was rammed
average speed 49 km/h forest was rammed
18%...
Cheers mate thanks for thatYeah, I think it does as it's brighter.
Although the Zumo 660, Nav V, and Nav VI are all shit compared to my Garmin 276cx GPS screen (which is a beast in direct sunlight, always readable). But I use the Nav VI as well on the BMW and it's ok mostly.
As I will now demonstrate in Direct Sunlight, my BMW Nav VI and my Zumo 660 compared to the GPS 276cx
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/mI8BVsb8ybg" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
I assume lean angles are measured from the vertical, so 30%+ is entirely possible if you are doing hairpins or pushing it on a 90+ deg turn. I’v Got to 36% on my XR and didn’t think I was pushing it and I wasn’t going fast.
10% for me.
I'm way more interested in why I have 3500 front brake applications and 11500 rear brake applications. I only ever use the rear when I'm stopped on a hill. I know about the linked brakes but that seems like a very high ratio.
I'm way more interested in why I have 3500 front brake applications and 11500 rear brake applications. I only ever use the rear when I'm stopped on a hill. I know about the linked brakes but that seems like a very high ratio.
It's because a light application of the 'front brake' will only apply the rear. Even in firmer application of the front brake lever, the rear brake is applied before the front in order to promote stability.
HTH
"...there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so." Hamlet
Similar threads
